Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


About CedarSpringsCG

  • Rank
    Master Expert Advanced Newbie
  • Birthday August 7

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    See Above...

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Umm, you forgot that you need secure transport to get it from the grower to the testing lab, then from the tester to the processor, then from the processor to the dispensary... Looks like the transporters will be the ones getting rich...
  2. Oh wow, sorry I was just reading the Snopes article when I came here and saw that... LOL since it was both March, I thought you were referring to that... I should read what I am responding to before I respond I guess. Just linked the 2 in my head without really looking at it.
  3. I almost exclusively use concentrates now. I love my vaporizer, but it wasn't cheap. I have seen a normal glass bowl, but instead of a hole at the bottom, it has 2 at the top, and then you use a dab tool heated to vaporize the concentrate... Fairly cheap, can be used for Hash, oil, butter, wax, shatter. Now, nectar collectors are for the hard core, but I just recently got a E-Nail for my Oil rig, and it is simply awesome, especially if more than 1 person is medicating. I can post some images of stuff if you want to see what I mean... I could snap some pictures tomorrow when I am out a
  4. http://www.snopes.com/fda-outlaws-cbd-oils/ Sorry was AFK for a bit. I was talking about them banning it in March. That was debunked. THe new one that they banned it on the 14th is not false, but really it is just a DEA rule, and most lawyers (for CBD producers so take it as you will) say this is DEA overreach, the courts say it is fine, so the DEA has no jurisdiction to change the law that the courts have ruled on... We will have to wait and see what they do with it and how it turns out when it starts going to court. I mean CBD is now schedule 1 according to the DEA, even produ
  5. They are. The law takes effect Dec 20, but all it does is establish a board which then writes all of the smaller rules and gives them 360 days to get started. Applications for a license starts on the 360th day unless the board decides to do it sooner, which they could. That doesn't mean they couldn't start sooner, as Lansing, Ann Arbor, Flint, and a few other places already allow them with licenses.
  6. The one from march was debunked on Snopes. However, the new articles aren't fake and have attached the Government Journal to show evidence.
  7. Thanks Malamute. So basically, it is illegal, you admit it is illegal, but you maybe can avoid punishment because of your excuses. Is that it in laymans terms?
  8. Sure. But as you argue all the time, dispensaries are illegal. So if you get to use section 8, and it is totally fine, why can't a dispensary do the same? What you are saying, is really your methods are illegal just like a dispensary is if they are using Section 8 as a defense. Since you say they can't do it, then logic dictates that you shouldn't be able to either. Just you are out of sight so no one notices it. But the patients who want to be 100% legal won't do that anyway. But back to the OP. I still think 4209 and these reports will be used to take away home grows. As state
  9. Well, sure stopping Leo from abusing power, and what a lawyer would recommend for transportation to keep people safe. I was asked 3 times today how the transportation was changing, and was unable to give a straight answer because of different interpretations of the law. Like I said, a locked case wasn't good enough if you can gain access with a knife, but your discussion is definitely worth listening to as well.
  10. Glad using a court defense is good for you. For many patients it isn't. And you can ask an attorney, Section 8 is a court defense. That means you are arrested, all of your stuff if taken under asset forfeiture, arraigned, but you can avoid jail by using it. Most people aren't willing to roll the dice on that one. Especially since once they confiscate your stuff, it is a long legal battle to get it back. Read up, Court Defense only for section 8. Some LEO let it slide, but many don't.
  11. sometimes talk shows allow for listeners request subjects to be talked about. I know that the PGT guys go way above and beyond, and always seem to move discussion based on callers, but often I am not able to call in. So I was just asking if there was a place or way that someone to ask for a specific subject to be discussed. I would suspect that the final discussions would still be made by PGT, but hmm, thinking more about this, you might be flooded by requests. Anyway, that was all I was asking, could someone make a request for these guys to discuss. I value their legal opinions and
  12. If you transfer to more than 5 people, it isn't within the law, and you aren't protected... Sorry
  13. I said Teenagers because that's what LEO throws out. It was wrong, what I meant was uncarded people. I think you are taking this wrong HL. I 100% support individual grow rights. I also think that 4209 is a horrible bill that will lead to the end of caregivers. I could be incorrect, and I hope I am. Honestly I would rather see legal transfer from ANY CG to ANY Patient be legal... Then I would argue with you that dispensaries are not needed at all. I'd still support them, but it wouldn't be necessary. But that isn't the case. So you can ONLY transfer to the 5 patients who call yo
  14. the more drug arrests they have, the more funding they get... Plain and simple. But, its Lansing that is causing this. By restricting and capping what Caregivers can do with their overages, and by the new 4209 which appears to be heading towards getting rid of Caregivers, many people are going back underground. What happens when growers go underground? More of it gets to teens and on the street... It's exactly what the laws they passed would do. I don't find it odd at all, it's expected.
  • Create New...