Jump to content

Schutte And Leyton Debate


DT61

Recommended Posts

Let's make it clear though. The question he refused to answer was whether he voted for mm. Not whether he agrees with the idea of mm or whether he supports it politically. To his credit he emphasised the 63% passage of the law. He also said that as AG he WILL clarify the law and he also pointed out that Cox has NOT done that.

Reading between the lines he is clearly on the mm side. He didn't want to answer whether he voted for it because he is afraid of political repercussions. But he made it crystal clear that pts and cgs need things made clear so they know where they stand.

On the other side Schuette said he voted no on the mm law.

I want to know why the MMMA board hasn't made endorsements to lead its members yet. We need a pinned topic wherein the board comes out with endorsements for all state races and as many fed and local ones as possible as well. What's the deal with this not getting done? We are coming up on 1 month before elections. Any organization that I have been a member of has always made endorsements ASAP after primaries so there is as much time as possible for members to get the word.

Come on MMMA, we don't pay you for nothing do we? Get on the stick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's make it clear though. The question he refused to answer was whether he voted for mm. Not whether he agrees with the idea of mm or whether he supports it politically. To his credit he emphasised the 63% passage of the law. He also said that as AG he WILL clarify the law and he also pointed out that Cox has NOT done that.

Reading between the lines he is clearly on the mm side. He didn't want to answer whether he voted for it because he is afraid of political repercussions. But he made it crystal clear that pts and cgs need things made clear so they know where they stand.

On the other side Schuette said he voted no on the mm law.

I want to know why the MMMA board hasn't made endorsements to lead its members yet. We need a pinned topic wherein the board comes out with endorsements for all state races and as many fed and local ones as possible as well. What's the deal with this not getting done? We are coming up on 1 month before elections. Any organization that I have been a member of has always made endorsements ASAP after primaries so there is as much time as possible for members to get the word.

Come on MMMA, we don't pay you for nothing do we? Get on the stick!

Amen!

 

Should be a list of people to vote for in every county in the state.

 

 

Mizerman :thumbsu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there have been a number of threads and discussions all throughout the election cycle on what various candidates believe. i, for one, am glad that the 3MA believes that given enough info, I will use MY vote in the best way possible. i don't need to be spoon-fed who to vote for. i need enough information to make a good judgment about who to vote for. that being said, throughout the primary cycle many people that are mods voiced their individual opinions about varying candidates. if you are really passionate about it, look it up on the forums instead of blaming the 3MA for not spoon feeding you your opinions. i don't mean to sound rude. but we are not children. and we are not all mainstream evangelicals that need our ballots filled out for us by someone else doing our thinking for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...