Revolt Over Wealthy Tax Cheats

[+EdwardGlen]

This will never happen here in America.

 

 

http://current.com/news/92966347_everyday-brits-are-in-revolt-of-wealthy-tax-cheats-why-cant-we.htm

 

a parallel universe where the Great Crash of 2008 was followed by a Tea Party of a very different kind. Enraged citizens gather in every city, week after week—to demand the government finally regulate the behavior of corporations and the superrich, and force them to start paying taxes. The protesters shut down the shops and offices of the companies that have most aggressively ripped off the country. The swelling movement is made up of everyone from teenagers to pensioners. They surround branches of the banks that caused this crash and force them to close, with banners saying, You Caused This Crisis. Now YOU Pay.

 

As people see their fellow citizens acting in self-defense, these tax-the-rich protests spread to even the most conservative parts of the country. It becomes the most-discussed subject on Twitter. Even right-wing media outlets, sensing a startling effect on the public mood, begin to praise the uprising, and dig up damning facts on the tax dodgers.

 

Instead of the fake populism of the Tea Party, there is a movement based on real populism. It shows that there is an alternative to making the poor and the middle class pay for a crisis caused by the rich. It shifts the national conversation. Instead of letting the government cut our services and increase our taxes, the people demand that it cut the endless and lavish aid for the rich and make them pay the massive sums they dodge in taxes.

 

This may sound like a fantasy—but it has all happened. The name of this parallel universe is Britain. As recently as this past fall, people here were asking the same questions liberal Americans have been glumly contemplating: Why is everyone being so passive? Why are we letting ourselves be ripped off? Why are people staying in their homes watching their flat-screens while our politicians strip away services so they can fatten the superrich even more?

 

And then twelve ordinary citizens—a nurse, a firefighter, a student, a TV researcher and others—met in a pub in London one night and realized they were asking the wrong questions. “We had spent all this energy asking why it wasn’t happening,” says Tom Philips, a 23-year-old nurse who was there that night, “and then we suddenly said, That’s what everybody else is saying too. Why don’t we just do it? Why don’t we just start? If we do it, maybe everybody will stop asking why it isn’t happening and join in. It’s a bit like that Kevin Costner film Field of Dreams. We thought, If you build it, they will come.”

 

The new Conservative-led government in Britain is imposing the most extreme cuts to public spending the country has seen since the 1920s. The fees for going to university are set to triple. Children’s hospitals like Great Ormond Street are facing 20 percent cuts in their budgets. In London alone, more than 200,000 people are being forced out of their homes and out of the city as the government takes away their housing subsidies.

 

Amid all these figures, this group of friends made some startling observations. Here’s one. All the cuts in housing subsidies, driving all those people out of their homes, are part of a package of cuts to the poor, adding up to £7 billion. Yet the magazine Private Eye reported that one company alone—Vodafone, one of Britain’s leading cellphone firms—owed an outstanding bill of £6 billion to the British taxpayers. According to Private Eye, Vodaphone had been refusing to pay for years, claiming that a crucial part of its business ran through a post office box in ultra-low-tax Luxembourg. The last Labour government, for all its many flaws, had insisted it pay up.

 

But when the Conservatives came to power, David Hartnett, head of the British equivalent of the Internal Revenue Service, apologized to rich people for being “too black and white about the law.” Soon after, Vodafone’s bill was reported to be largely canceled, with just over £1 billion paid in the end. Days later George Osborne, the finance minister, was urging people to invest in Vodafone by taking representatives of the company with him on a taxpayer-funded trip to India—a country where that company is also being pursued for unpaid taxes. Vodafone and Hartnett deny this account, claiming it was simply a longstanding “dispute” over fees that ended with the company paying the correct amount. The government has been forced under pressure to order the independent National Audit Office to investigate the affair and to pore over every detail of the corporation’s tax deal.

 

“It was clear to us that if this one company had been made to pay its taxes, almost all these people could have been kept from being forced out of their homes,” says Sam Greene, another of the protesters. “We keep being told there’s no alternative to cutting services. This just showed it was rubbish. So we decided we had to do something.”

 

They resolved to set up an initial protest that would prick people’s attention. They called themselves UK Uncut and asked several liberal-left journalists, on Twitter (full disclosure: I was one of them), to announce a time and place where people could meet “to take direct action protest against the cuts and show there’s an alternative.” People were urged to gather at 9:30 am on a Wednesday morning outside the Ritz hotel in central London and look for an orange umbrella. More than sixty people arrived, and they went to one of the busiest Vodafone stores—on Oxford Street, the city’s biggest shopping area—and sat down in front of it so nobody could get in.

 

“What really struck me is that when we explained our reasons, ordinary people walking down Oxford Street were incredibly supportive,” says Alex Miller, a 31-year-old nurse. “People would stop and tell us how they were terrified of losing their homes and their jobs—and when they heard that virtually none of it had to happen if only these massive companies paid their taxes, they were furious. Several people stopped what they were doing, sat down and joined us. I guess it’s at that point that I realized this was going to really take off.”

 

That first protest grabbed a little media attention—and then the next day, in a different city, three other Vodafone stores were shut down in the northern city of Leeds, by unconnected protests. UK Uncut realized this could be replicated across the country. So the group set up a Twitter account and a website, where members announced there would be a national day of protest the following Saturday. They urged anybody who wanted to organize a protest to e-mail them so it could be added to a Google map. Britain’s most prominent tweeters, such as actor Stephen Fry, joined in.

 

That Saturday Vodafone’s stores were shut down across the country by peaceful sit-ins. The crowds sang songs and announced they had come as volunteer tax collectors. Prime Minister David Cameron wants axed government services to be replaced by a “Big Society,” in which volunteers do the jobs instead. So UK Uncut announced it was the Big Society Tax Collection Agency. (more on this story at link) http://figrd.blogspot.com

[+420Atheist]

It makes me want to move to the UK. It is so sad that the tea party can't seem to see that it is no coincidence they want the same thing the wealthy want. They don't understand basic economics. No rich person has ever said "hey I got an extra ten million dollars this year because I got some big tax breaks. I think I will hire some people with it." Money does not trickle down it trickles up. Jobs are created because sales go up so much that companies can't keep product on the shelf without hiring more people to make the product. Stuff is purchased because the poor and middle class have money to buy it. Jobs are created because of need not because the wealthy have more money. The Bush tax cuts are a perfect example. Rich were given tax cuts during Bushes presidency yet unemployment continued to raise. But the tea party continues to believe big lies without doing any fact checking. Most will tell you unemployment did not rise under Bush.

[AmishRnot4ganja]

The Tea Party is a prime example of the term "being suckered". A couple of billionaire brothers named the Kochs fund the Tea Party. They are anti union, anti government (because government "takes their money") and, in my opinion, anti-American.

[+420Atheist]

The Tea Party is a prime example of the term "being suckered". A couple of billionaire brothers named the Kochs fund the Tea Party. They are anti union, anti government (because government "takes their money") and, in my opinion, anti-American.

 

Yup a lot of that money comes from Freedomworks the Dick Army outfit. The tea party believes they are new but they are funded by the same conservative players that have always run the republican party.

 

What I find interesting is the Patriot Act is the most sweeping legislation that increases government power EVER in our nations history but yet there is nearly complete silence from the tea party. They are more concerned about protecting the insurance companies from people with preexisting conditions.

[+EdwardGlen]

Yup a lot of that money comes from Freedomworks the Dick Army outfit. The tea party believes they are new but they are funded by the same conservative players that have always run the republican party.

 

What I find interesting is the Patriot Act is the most sweeping legislation that increases government power EVER in our nations history but yet there is nearly complete silence from the tea party. They are more concerned about protecting the insurance companies from people with preexisting conditions.

 

BREAKING: House effort to suspend rules and pass Patriot Act extension FAILS, 277-148. More soon…

[+420Atheist]

BREAKING: House effort to suspend rules and pass Patriot Act extension FAILS, 277-148. More soon…

 

Wow that is cool. I have not heard one tea party person talk about this. I would like to see the vote tally and see which way people voted.