Schuette To "clarify" The Mmma

[jamieuke]

http://www.mml.org/pdf/events/2011-MMA%20Seminar%20Invitation.pdf

[LansingAreaCaregiver]

I love the fact that no one who is directly effected by this legislation is invited or will be presenting. PAs, Law Enforcement, but no patients or caregivers. I say we crash their little circle jerk. Let's pack the house at each of these seminars with patients, caregivers and civil liberty attorneys. Make sure that they hear the other side of the story. We need to challenge Schuette every time he comes out spouting his nonsense as gospel.

 

Let's get a few patients at each of these seminars to ask what is being done to make the program work? What is being done to hold the state accountable to their responsibilities under the act? Maybe a few patients who these communities will be likely 'zoning out' of their communities to testify about the impacts this will have on their lives.

[bobandtorey]

I love the fact that no one who is directly effected by this legislation is invited or will be presenting. PAs, Law Enforcement, but no patients or caregivers. I say we crash their little circle jerk. Let's pack the house at each of these seminars with patients, caregivers and civil liberty attorneys. Make sure that they hear the other side of the story. We need to challenge Schuette every time he comes out spouting his nonsense as gospel.

 

Let's get a few patients at each of these seminars to ask what is being done to make the program work? What is being done to hold the state accountable to their responsibilities under the act? Maybe a few patients who these communities will be likely 'zoning out' of their communities to testify about the impacts this will have on their lives.

 

They wont let us go here only Leo's

[+ProPlayer420]

They wont let us go here only Leo's

Can't stop us from protesting these places day of! We need to gather the locals around each area to make sure we have representation outside the doors at least.

[+Dizledot]

I believe this is the same thing I posted where he is inviting local officials to hear him speak. I just spoke to a huge republican supporter and this person was appalled to hear he is attacking the sick and defenseless. We need to do a better job getting the word out....and by the way the republican supporters realize he is micro managing the state and they are starting to question his actions. Maybe there is hope for us after all.

[cristinew]

we got into his meeting in the UP, you should be able to down state

[LansingAreaCaregiver]

I don't think they are just for LEO. The link has the registration form. Doesn't say private meeting. I'd say register and if they let you in, give'em hell. If they say you can't come, use it as ammo against them. Write letters in your local paper publicly calling them out. Purposefully excluding people is much more nefarious than accidentally forgetting to invite them.

 

I'm not sure that a protest would do much at these venues unless they specifically tell us we aren't welcome. I'd much prefer to see our people in the meeting, participating respectfully but forcefully, and asking intelligent questions that will expose their feeble attempts at undermining the will of the voters.

 

If the wife wasn't expecting a baby any day, I'd be hitting at least two of these. Hey, free breakfast on Schuette's dime! (OK, technically taxpayers dime, but...)

[cristinew]

http://michiganmedicalmarijuana.org/topic/34140-yooper-notice-82711/page__pid__325256#entry325256

 

we did it in the UP,

[cristinew]

be polite get to the point, dont yell free the weed and you might get somewhere

[Frank R]

If this event is going to be in a hotel, maybe we could rent the adjoining conference room. We could troll the press and public that shows up for the Schuette event and just make them look bad. What do you folks think? We could out class them. Thanks, Bb

 

Brilliant!

[Timmahh]

protest and recall shuitte encampments as well..

 

when we GATHER the troops, we want them all.

[+Dizledot]

I don't think they are just for LEO. The link has the registration form. Doesn't say private meeting. I'd say register and if they let you in, give'em hell. If they say you can't come, use it as ammo against them. Write letters in your local paper publicly calling them out. Purposefully excluding people is much more nefarious than accidentally forgetting to invite them.

 

I'm not sure that a protest would do much at these venues unless they specifically tell us we aren't welcome. I'd much prefer to see our people in the meeting, participating respectfully but forcefully, and asking intelligent questions that will expose their feeble attempts at undermining the will of the voters.

 

If the wife wasn't expecting a baby any day, I'd be hitting at least two of these. Hey, free breakfast on Schuette's dime! (OK, technically taxpayers dime, but...)

 

These seminars weren't set up for LEO. I'm trying to change a couple of my meetings around to make the one scheduled in my area. I plan to take the person I spoke to earlier today who is not a patient or caregiver but is visibly upset at the thought of those who were recommended mm being attacked. In fact they asked me to send any and all info to them on the law suits. This person is relentless and will make sure they are heard and understood.

[cristinew]

its bills job to enforce the law, he must be reminded that the state is not following the law as to getting cards out in time, that causes leo to have a hard time, not adding new conditions, they must follow the law as do we, We must turn the topic to them not following the law, as most patients are

[Croppled1]

http://michiganmedic...256#entry325256

 

we did it in the UP,

 

 

What did you list in your sign up information for a Title and Organization represented ? I find it very sad the AG wants to set up rules to enforce against the participants without first explaining his interpretation of the Act to the patients involved very clearly with documentation . The fact that he hasn't is as dehumanizing and uncaring as one can be . The fact he cannot discern a working set of rules allowing for all necessary activity to take place in a legal manner within our State Boundries from the Acts wording seems very questionable and he should be taken to task on it .

[kruztydj]

If this event is going to be in a hotel, maybe we could rent the adjoining conference room. We could troll the press and public that shows up for the Schuette event and just make them look bad. What do you folks think? We could out class them. Thanks, Bb

Lets do it and gas is in the car. I can and will do the GR one to start with.

[medicineman420]

11-29 I am willing to do Saginaw....PM me lets get this ball rolling

[bobandtorey]

Here's the audio, they got rid of the video part: http://mirsnews.podb...ical-marijuana/

 

OMG!!

this is worst then i thought

[+Dizledot]

I am curious. These seminars are closed to the public it seems. They deal with policy and local government officials. Is there a violation of the open meetings act here?

 

No violation unless they are deliberating on policies and voting.

[Michael Komorn]

AttorneyGeneral Bill Schuette

 

Presents

 

Clearingthe Air: Implementing and Enforcing

 

Michigan’sMedical Marijuana Law

 

A seminar for law enforcementprofessionals and local government officials

 

 

GrandRapids

 

AmwayGrand Hotel ◦ Wednesday, November 16, 2011

 

Livonia

 

LivoniaMarriott Hotel ◦ Thursday, November 17, 2011

 

Saginaw

 

HorizonsConference Center ◦ Tuesday, November 29, 2011

 

TraverseCity

 

ParkPlace Hotel ◦ Wednesday, November 30, 2011

 

PresentationsFrom:

 

•Michigan Department of Attorney General

 

•Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs

 

•Michigan State Police

 

•Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan

 

•Experts in Municipal Law

 

•Medical Experts

 

Topicsto be Covered:

 

•The Regulatory Scheme and the application process

 

•Recent court rulings and pending cases

 

•Attorney General Opinions and Amicus Curiae filings

 

•Local zoning issues and challenges for municipalities

 

•Challenges for law enforcement

 

Allseminars will begin at 9:00 AM and conclude at 1:00 PM.

 

Acontinental breakfast will be available. Lunch will be served at noon.

 

There is no cost to attend thisseminar. Space is limited and pre-registration is required.

 

RSVPto agregistration@michigan.gov.

 

 

Email To:

 

agregistration@michigan.gov

 

 

Hello,

 

 

I work for Attorney and President of the Michigan MedicalMarijuana Association Michael Komorn, and he has expressed the desire to attendyour upcoming seminar, "Clearing the air: Implementing and Enforcing Michigan's Medical Marijuana Law." Michael would like to attend the seminarbeing held in Livonia on November 17th. I am having difficulty registering to attend. Is there any way you could send me aregistration form?

 

 

 

--

 

Sincerely,

 

 

Brian Burke

 

 

The Law Offices of Michael Komorn

 

3000 Town Center, Suite 1800

 

Southfield, Mi 48075

 

(248) 357-2550

 

(248) 351-2211 fax

 

 

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Jensen, Jennifer (AG)<JensenJ1@michigan.gov> wrote:

 

Thank you for your interest in ‘Clearing the Air:Implementing and Enforcing Michigan’s Medical Marijuana Law’. Unfortunately, at this time the seminar isonly open to Law Enforcement and Local Government Officials and is closed tothe public and the press. Each venue haslimited seating and there is very high demand on those seats.

 

 

Thank you again for your interest, and have a pleasant day.

 

 

Jenny Jensen

 

517.373.1146

 

[+Annnie]

Get video and audio so we can defend ourselves point by point. Schuette overstepped at the press conference and lost some support because of it. He is bound to do that again. He's his own worst enemy. We need to show that we are smarter than him. Hate makes you stupid. When he let his haters talk last time they just sounded blinded by hate of cannabis and running off at the mouth.

 

After witnessing firsthand the disrespect by our senators to Patients and caregivers and refusal to even listen to heartfelt and educated discussion by these ppl a management specialist friend of mine gave me some of his ideas about our plight.

 

Three part plan to making MM more accepted in Mi.

1. Interact in the program. Following all the Rules to the letter as the layman reader reads them as well as keeping abreast of recent court standing. Make that medicine. Cure your Cancer,,, Or simply alleviate the symptoms of your condition.Try different means of ingestion or application. Teach other ppl to do so as well. Show the ppl in your life how amazing and positive this program is.. Use your real name.

2. Expose The attrocious behavior of Elected officials and Anti MM proponents on all levels. When any one of them calls anyone of us a stupid lazy pothead i hope it will be on tape and sent right in to your local and statewide news resources. Along with an excellently written explanation of the event so they can see right off we arent stupid. Using our Real Name. We need to expose to the general public the attack on the sick and poor and needy. They need to associate that Anns not really stupid or lazy or harmful.. thats Ann you know the one who is so active in blank blank and blank.. We are the watchdogs and we need to add to this content alot more than we do.

3. EDUCATE EDUCATE EDUCATE.. the general public needs to hear and be exposed to truth aLOT more than they are. its our job to do that.. our opposition isnt going to do that for us.

[+Annnie]

11-29 I am willing to do Saginaw....PM me lets get this ball rolling

If it is a go i will start rallying from my area.. let me know..

[Iceman081]

Heard back From the Grand Rapids Venue. It would cost $750 to rent a conference room. That's a lot of money just to be in the same building. What do you folks think? Thanks, Bb

 

I figured it would be high Joe, after all it is the Amway.............lol. It sure would be worth it to see the look on his face, I'm sure it would be shocking to him. Were you trying to rent it through the 3MA Joe, keep in mind who owns that hotel and they are huge donors to him too.

[Iceman081]

I didn't tell them who I was. I'm sure they wouldn't rent it to us at all. Thanks Brother, BB

 

 

I knew that already Joe, and I'm sure you know as a Marine the element of suprise means everything. Welcome to our party, I'll bet we could lure some in with free donuts and coffee Thanks for all you do Brother.

[+Dizledot]

I tend to agree with you, but I think there may be an issue if there is a quorum present vs sending one or two representatives who would report back in an open meeting. I recall you have some experience with local government so your insight would help. Correct me if I am wrong, but in local government you can have a closed session for discussion but must vote in public. Perhaps a short discussion or explaination from you might help Diz, if we know the rules we can keep an eye on them to be sure everything is up and up. We just need to know what to look out for.

 

This has been a long debated subject...unfortunately you can have an entire city counsel or township board attend. This would be considered educational and something one would take back to an open meeting to discuss. Some of these officials are pretty slick at circumventing the open meetings act by doing what we call a round robin. One member calls member #2 to discuss options and how to vote on the subject #2 calls #3 and so forth. Under a round robin there is never a quorum. I believe that there may have even been a previous attorney general opinion on this a couple of years ago as well. The document of the act may help provide some understanding on the act whic is good for all of us to understand as we deal with communities responses to this. I'm afraid you would have to actually sit at their table and record them deliberating how to vote and then have independent witnesses. They way the act is written this is a difficult one to actually prove unless it is blatant.

OPEN MEETINGS ACT>AN ACT to require certain meetings of certain public bodies to be open to the public; to require notice and the keeping of minutes of meetings; to provide for enforcement; to provide for invalidation of governmental decisions under certain circumstances; to provide penalties; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

 

15.261 Short title; effect of act on certain charter provisions, ordinances, or resolutions.

 

Sec. 1.

 

(1) This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Open meetings act”.

 

(2) This act shall supersede all local charter provisions, ordinances, or resolutions which relate to requirements for meetings of local public bodies to be open to the public.

 

(3) After the effective date of this act, nothing in this act shall prohibit a public body from adopting an ordinance, resolution, rule, or charter provision which would require a greater degree of openness relative to meetings of public bodies than the standards provided for in this act.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

>15.262 Definitions.

Sec. 2.

 

As used in this act:

 

(a) “Public body” means any state or local legislative or governing body, including a board, commission, committee, subcommittee, authority, or council, that is empowered by state constitution, statute, charter, ordinance, resolution, or rule to exercise governmental or proprietary authority or perform a governmental or proprietary function; a lessee of such a body performing an essential public purpose and function pursuant to the lease agreement; or the board of a nonprofit corporation formed by a city under section 4o of the home rule city act, 1909 PA 279, MCL 117.4o.

 

(b) “Meeting” means the convening of a public body at which a quorum is present for the purpose of deliberating toward or rendering a decision on a public policy, or any meeting of the board of a nonprofit corporation formed by a city under section 4o of the home rule city act, 1909 PA 279, MCL 117.4o.

 

© “Closed session” means a meeting or part of a meeting of a public body that is closed to the public.

 

(d) “Decision” means a determination, action, vote, or disposition upon a motion, proposal, recommendation, resolution, order, ordinance, bill, or measure on which a vote by members of a public body is required and by which a public body effectuates or formulates public policy.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 2001, Act 38, Imd. Eff. July 11, 2001

 

>15.263 Meetings, decisions, and deliberations of public body; requirements; attending or addressing meeting of public body; tape-recording, videotaping, broadcasting, and telecasting proceedings; rules and regulations; exclusion from meeting; exemptions.

 

Sec. 3.

 

(1) All meetings of a public body shall be open to the public and shall be held in a place available to the general public. All persons shall be permitted to attend any meeting except as otherwise provided in this act. The right of a person to attend a meeting of a public body includes the right to tape-record, to videotape, to broadcast live on radio, and to telecast live on television the proceedings of a public body at a public meeting. The exercise of this right shall not be dependent upon the prior approval of the public body. However, a public body may establish reasonable rules and regulations in order to minimize the possibility of disrupting the meeting.

 

(2) All decisions of a public body shall be made at a meeting open to the public.

 

(3) All deliberations of a public body constituting a quorum of its members shall take place at a meeting open to the public except as provided in this section and sections 7 and 8.

 

(4) A person shall not be required as a condition of attendance at a meeting of a public body to register or otherwise provide his or her name or other information or otherwise to fulfill a condition precedent to attendance.

 

(5) A person shall be permitted to address a meeting of a public body under rules established and recorded by the public body. The legislature or a house of the legislature may provide by rule that the right to address may be limited to prescribed times at hearings and committee meetings only.

 

(6) A person shall not be excluded from a meeting otherwise open to the public except for a breach of the peace actually committed at the meeting.

 

(7) This act does not apply to the following public bodies only when deliberating the merits of a case:

 

(a) The worker's compensation appeal board created under the worker's disability compensation act of 1969, Act No. 317 of the Public Acts of 1969, as amended, being sections 418.101 to 418.941 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

 

(b) The employment security board of review created under the Michigan employment security act, Act No. 1 of the Public Acts of the Extra Session of 1936, as amended, being sections 421.1 to 421.73 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

 

© The state tenure commission created under Act No. 4 of the Public Acts of the Extra Session of 1937, as amended, being sections 38.71 to 38.191 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, when acting as a board of review from the decision of a controlling board.

 

(d) An arbitrator or arbitration panel appointed by the employment relations commission under the authority given the commission by Act No. 176 of the Public Acts of 1939, as amended, being sections 423.1 to 423.30 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

 

(e) An arbitration panel selected under chapter 50A of the revised judicature act of 1961, Act No. 236 of the Public Acts of 1961, being sections 600.5040 to 600.5065 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

 

(f) The Michigan public service commission created under Act No. 3 of the Public Acts of 1939, being sections 460.1 to 460.8 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

 

(8) This act does not apply to an association of insurers created under the insurance code of 1956, Act No. 218 of the Public Acts of 1956, being sections 500.100 to 500.8302 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, or other association or facility formed under Act No. 218 of the Public Acts of 1956 as a nonprofit organization of insurer members.

 

(9) This act does not apply to a committee of a public body which adopts a nonpolicymaking resolution of tribute or memorial which resolution is not adopted at a meeting.

 

(10) This act does not apply to a meeting which is a social or chance gathering or conference not designed to avoid this act.

 

(11) This act shall not apply to the Michigan veterans' trust fund board of trustees or a county or district committee created under Act No. 9 of the Public Acts of the first extra session of 1946, being sections 35.601 to 35.610 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, when the board of trustees or county or district committee is deliberating the merits of an emergent need. A decision of the board of trustees or county or district committee made under this subsection shall be reconsidered by the board or committee at its next regular or special meeting consistent with the requirements of this act. “Emergent need” means a situation which the board of trustees, by rules promulgated under the administrative procedures act of 1969, Act No. 306 of the Public Acts of 1969, as amended, being sections 24.201 to 24.328 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, determines requires immediate action.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 1981, Act 161, Imd. Eff. Nov. 30, 1981 ;-- Am. 1986, Act 269, Imd. Eff. Dec. 19, 1986 ;-- Am. 1988, Act 158, Imd. Eff. June 14, 1988 ;-- Am. 1988, Act 278, Imd. Eff. July 27, 1988

Admin Rule: R 35.621 of the Michigan Administrative Code.

>15.264 Public notice of meetings generally; contents; places of posting.

Sec. 4.

 

The following provisions shall apply with respect to public notice of meetings:

 

(a) A public notice shall always contain the name of the public body to which the notice applies, its telephone number if one exists, and its address.

 

(b) A public notice for a public body shall always be posted at its principal office and any other locations considered appropriate by the public body. Cable television may also be utilized for purposes of posting public notice.

 

© If a public body is a part of a state department, part of the legislative or judicial branch of state government, part of an institution of higher education, or part of a political subdivision or school district, a public notice shall also be posted in the respective principal office of the state department, the institution of higher education, clerk of the house of representatives, secretary of the state senate, clerk of the supreme court, or political subdivision or school district.

 

(d) If a public body does not have a principal office, the required public notice for a local public body shall be posted in the office of the county clerk in which the public body serves and the required public notice for a state public body shall be posted in the office of the secretary of state.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 1984, Act 87, Imd. Eff. Apr. 19, 1984

 

15.265 Public notice of regular meetings, change in schedule of regular meetings, rescheduled regular meetings, or special meetings; time for posting; statement of date, time, and place; applicability of subsection (4); recess or adjournment; emergency sessions; meeting in residential dwelling; notice.

 

Sec. 5.

 

(1) A meeting of a public body shall not be held unless public notice is given as provided in this section by a person designated by the public body.

 

(2) For regular meetings of a public body, there shall be posted within 10 days after the first meeting of the public body in each calendar or fiscal year a public notice stating the dates, times, and places of its regular meetings.

 

(3) If there is a change in the schedule of regular meetings of a public body, there shall be posted within 3 days after the meeting at which the change is made, a public notice stating the new dates, times, and places of its regular meetings.

 

(4) Except as provided in this subsection or in subsection (6), for a rescheduled regular or a special meeting of a public body, a public notice stating the date, time, and place of the meeting shall be posted at least 18 hours before the meeting. The requirement of 18-hour notice shall not apply to special meetings of subcommittees of a public body or conference committees of the state legislature. A conference committee shall give a 6-hour notice. A second conference committee shall give a 1-hour notice. Notice of a conference committee meeting shall include written notice to each member of the conference committee and the majority and minority leader of each house indicating time and place of the meeting. This subsection does not apply to a public meeting held pursuant to section 4(2) to (5) of Act No. 239 of the Public Acts of 1955, as amended, being section 200.304 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

 

(5) A meeting of a public body which is recessed for more than 36 hours shall be reconvened only after public notice, which is equivalent to that required under subsection (4), has been posted. If either house of the state legislature is adjourned or recessed for less than 18 hours, the notice provisions of subsection (4) are not applicable. Nothing in this section shall bar a public body from meeting in emergency session in the event of a severe and imminent threat to the health, safety, or welfare of the public when 2/3 of the members serving on the body decide that delay would be detrimental to efforts to lessen or respond to the threat.

 

(6) A meeting of a public body may only take place in a residential dwelling if a nonresidential building within the boundary of the local governmental unit or school system is not available without cost to the public body. For a meeting of a public body which is held in a residential dwelling, notice of the meeting shall be published as a display advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation in the city or township in which the meeting is to be held. The notice shall be published not less than 2 days before the day on which the meeting is held, and shall state the date, time, and place of the meeting. The notice, which shall be at the bottom of the display advertisement and which shall be set off in a conspicuous manner, shall include the following language: “This meeting is open to all members of the public under Michigan's open meetings act”.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 256, Imd. Eff. June 21, 1978 ;-- Am. 1982, Act 134, Imd. Eff. Apr. 22, 1982 ;-- Am. 1984, Act 167, Imd. Eff. June 29, 1984

 

15.266 Providing copies of public notice on written request; fee.

 

Sec. 6.

 

(1) Upon the written request of an individual, organization, firm, or corporation, and upon the requesting party's payment of a yearly fee of not more than the reasonable estimated cost for printing and postage of such notices, a public body shall send to the requesting party by first class mail a copy of any notice required to be posted pursuant to section 5(2) to (5).

 

(2) Upon written request, a public body, at the same time a public notice of a meeting is posted pursuant to section 5, shall provide a copy of the public notice of that meeting to any newspaper published in the state and to any radio and television station located in the state, free of charge.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

 

>15.267 Closed sessions; roll call vote; separate set of minutes.

 

Sec. 7.

 

(1) A 2/3 roll call vote of members elected or appointed and serving is required to call a closed session, except for the closed sessions permitted under section 8(a), (b), ©, (g), (i), and (j). The roll call vote and the purpose or purposes for calling the closed session shall be entered into the minutes of the meeting at which the vote is taken.

 

(2) A separate set of minutes shall be taken by the clerk or the designated secretary of the public body at the closed session. These minutes shall be retained by the clerk of the public body, are not available to the public, and shall only be disclosed if required by a civil action filed under section 10, 11, or 13. These minutes may be destroyed 1 year and 1 day after approval of the minutes of the regular meeting at which the closed session was approved.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 81, Eff. Apr. 1, 1994 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 464, Imd. Eff. Dec. 26, 1996

15.268 Closed sessions; permissible purposes.

Sec. 8.

 

A public body may meet in a closed session only for the following purposes:

 

(a) To consider the dismissal, suspension, or disciplining of, or to hear complaints or charges brought against, or to consider a periodic personnel evaluation of, a public officer, employee, staff member, or individual agent, if the named person requests a closed hearing. A person requesting a closed hearing may rescind the request at any time, in which case the matter at issue shall be considered after the rescission only in open sessions.

 

(b) To consider the dismissal, suspension, or disciplining of a student if the public body is part of the school district, intermediate school district, or institution of higher education that the student is attending, and if the student or the student's parent or guardian requests a closed hearing.

 

© For strategy and negotiation sessions connected with the negotiation of a collective bargaining agreement if either negotiating party requests a closed hearing.

 

(d) To consider the purchase or lease of real property up to the time an option to purchase or lease that real property is obtained.

 

(e) To consult with its attorney regarding trial or settlement strategy in connection with specific pending litigation, but only if an open meeting would have a detrimental financial effect on the litigating or settlement position of the public body.

 

(f) To review and consider the contents of an application for employment or appointment to a public office if the candidate requests that the application remain confidential. However, except as otherwise provided in this subdivision, all interviews by a public body for employment or appointment to a public office shall be held in an open meeting pursuant to this act. This subdivision does not apply to a public office described in subdivision (j).

 

(g) Partisan caucuses of members of the state legislature.

 

(h) To consider material exempt from discussion or disclosure by state or federal statute.

 

(i) For a compliance conference conducted by the department of commerce under section 16231 of the public health code, Act No. 368 of the Public Acts of 1978, being section 333.16231 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, before a complaint is issued.

 

(j) In the process of searching for and selecting a president of an institution of higher education established under section 4, 5, or 6 of article VIII of the state constitution of 1963, to review the specific contents of an application, to conduct an interview with a candidate, or to discuss the specific qualifications of a candidate if the particular process of searching for and selecting a president of an institution of higher education meets all of the following requirements:

 

(i) The search committee in the process, appointed by the governing board, consists of at least 1 student of the institution, 1 faculty member of the institution, 1 administrator of the institution, 1 alumnus of the institution, and 1 representative of the general public. The search committee also may include 1 or more members of the governing board of the institution, but the number shall not constitute a quorum of the governing board. However, the search committee shall not be constituted in such a way that any 1 of the groups described in this subparagraph constitutes a majority of the search committee.

 

(ii) After the search committee recommends the 5 final candidates, the governing board does not take a vote on a final selection for the president until at least 30 days after the 5 final candidates have been publicly identified by the search committee.

 

(iii) The deliberations and vote of the governing board of the institution on selecting the president take place in an open session of the governing board.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 1984, Act 202, Imd. Eff. July 3, 1984 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 81, Eff. Apr. 1, 1994 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 464, Imd. Eff. Dec. 26, 1996

 

15.269 Minutes.

 

Sec. 9.

 

(1) Each public body shall keep minutes of each meeting showing the date, time, place, members present, members absent, any decisions made at a meeting open to the public, and the purpose or purposes for which a closed session is held. The minutes shall include all roll call votes taken at the meeting. The public body shall make any corrections in the minutes at the next meeting after the meeting to which the minutes refer. The public body shall make corrected minutes available at or before the next subsequent meeting after correction. The corrected minutes shall show both the original entry and the correction.

 

(2) Minutes are public records open to public inspection, and a public body shall make the minutes available at the address designated on posted public notices pursuant to section 4. The public body shall make copies of the minutes available to the public at the reasonable estimated cost for printing and copying.

 

(3) A public body shall make proposed minutes available for public inspection within 8 business days after the meeting to which the minutes refer. The public body shall make approved minutes available for public inspection within 5 business days after the meeting at which the minutes are approved by the public body.

 

(4) A public body shall not include in or with its minutes any personally identifiable information that, if released, would prevent the public body from complying with section 444 of subpart 4 of part C of the general education provisions act, 20 USC 1232g, commonly referred to as the family educational rights and privacy act of 1974.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977 ;-- Am. 1982, Act 130, Imd. Eff. Apr. 20, 1982 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 305, Imd. Eff. Aug. 11, 2004

15.270 Decisions of public body; presumption; civil action to invalidate; jurisdiction; venue; reenactment of disputed decision.

Sec. 10.

 

(1) Decisions of a public body shall be presumed to have been adopted in compliance with the requirements of this act. The attorney general, the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the public body serves, or any person may commence a civil action in the circuit court to challenge the validity of a decision of a public body made in violation of this act.

 

(2) A decision made by a public body may be invalidated if the public body has not complied with the requirements of section 3(1), (2), and (3) in making the decision or if failure to give notice in accordance with section 5 has interfered with substantial compliance with section 3(1), (2), and (3) and the court finds that the noncompliance or failure has impaired the rights of the public under this act.

 

(3) The circuit court shall not have jurisdiction to invalidate a decision of a public body for a violation of this act unless an action is commenced pursuant to this section within the following specified period of time:

 

(a) Within 60 days after the approved minutes are made available to the public by the public body except as otherwise provided in subdivision (b).

 

(b) If the decision involves the approval of contracts, the receipt or acceptance of bids, the making of assessments, the procedures pertaining to the issuance of bonds or other evidences of indebtedness, or the submission of a borrowing proposal to the electors, within 30 days after the approved minutes are made available to the public pursuant to that decision.

 

(4) Venue for an action under this section shall be any county in which a local public body serves or, if the decision of a state public body is at issue, in Ingham county.

 

(5) In any case where an action has been initiated to invalidate a decision of a public body on the ground that it was not taken in conformity with the requirements of this act, the public body may, without being deemed to make any admission contrary to its interest, reenact the disputed decision in conformity with this act. A decision reenacted in this manner shall be effective from the date of reenactment and shall not be declared invalid by reason of a deficiency in the procedure used for its initial enactment.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

>15.271 Civil action to compel compliance or enjoin noncompliance; commencement; venue; security not required; commencement of action for mandamus; court costs and attorney fees.

Sec. 11.

 

(1) If a public body is not complying with this act, the attorney general, prosecuting attorney of the county in which the public body serves, or a person may commence a civil action to compel compliance or to enjoin further noncompliance with this act.

 

(2) An action for injunctive relief against a local public body shall be commenced in the circuit court, and venue is proper in any county in which the public body serves. An action for an injunction against a state public body shall be commenced in the circuit court and venue is proper in any county in which the public body has its principal office, or in Ingham county. If a person commences an action for injunctive relief, that person shall not be required to post security as a condition for obtaining a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order.

 

(3) An action for mandamus against a public body under this act shall be commenced in the court of appeals.

 

(4) If a public body is not complying with this act, and a person commences a civil action against the public body for injunctive relief to compel compliance or to enjoin further noncompliance with the act and succeeds in obtaining relief in the action, the person shall recover court costs and actual attorney fees for the action.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

>15.272 Violation as misdemeanor; penalty.

Sec. 12.

 

(1) A public official who intentionally violates this act is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000.00.

 

(2) A public official who is convicted of intentionally violating a provision of this act for a second time within the same term shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not more than $2,000.00, or imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

 

15.273 Violation; liability.

 

Sec. 13.

 

(1) A public official who intentionally violates this act shall be personally liable in a civil action for actual and exemplary damages of not more than $500.00 total, plus court costs and actual attorney fees to a person or group of persons bringing the action.

 

(2) Not more than 1 action under this section shall be brought against a public official for a single meeting. An action under this section shall be commenced within 180 days after the date of the violation which gives rise to the cause of action.

 

(3) An action for damages under this section may be joined with an action for injunctive or exemplary relief under section 11.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

 

>15.273a Selection of president by governing board of higher education institution; violation; civil fine.

 

Sec. 13a.

 

If the governing board of an institution of higher education established under section 4, 5, or 6 of article VIII of the state constitution of 1963 violates this act with respect to the process of selecting a president of the institution at any time after the recommendation of final candidates to the governing board, as described in section 8(j), the institution is responsible for the payment of a civil fine of not more than $500,000.00. This civil fine is in addition to any other remedy or penalty under this act. To the extent possible, any payment of fines imposed under this section shall be paid from funds allocated by the institution of higher education to pay for the travel and expenses of the members of the governing board.

 

History: Add. 1996, Act 464, Imd. Eff. Dec. 26, 1996

15.274 Repeal of MCL 15.251 to 15.253.

Sec. 14.

 

Act No. 261 of the Public Acts of 1968, being sections 15.251 to 15.253 of the Compiled Laws of 1970, is repealed.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

15.275 Effective date.

Sec. 15.

 

This act shall take effect January 1, 1977.

 

History: 1976, Act 267, Eff. Mar. 31, 1977

 

<br style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">© 2009 Legislative Council, State of Michigan<br style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium; ">

[+Dizledot]

They are spending huge bucks to put on this song and dance. Don't you think the could have used a Ramada or HJ? First class for the government. The jailhouse for the sick. Thanks, Bb

As I said earlier guy's, just who is footing the bill for this grand display of ignorance??? I would be willing to bet the taxpayers are! We need to FOIA all documents related to the rental of all three venues as well as who paid for the food. If it was taxpayer money this needs to be brought out due to the fact the state is broke and this assjack is wasting valuable tax dollars that should be spent elsewhere!!!!