peanutbutter Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 (edited) http://www.legislatu...c-09-11-063.pdf Haven't had the time to count or list them yet. I have to rush off to Lansing for something else Edited September 10, 2012 by peanutbutter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 (edited) here are a few that peaked my interest.. SB 17 Sen. Jones Health; pharmaceuticals; formation of medicinal marihuana clubs or operation of medical marihuana bars; prohibit. Amends 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.1101 - 333.25211) by adding sec. 7421. Reported by Committee on Health Policy. SB 244 Sen. Jones Criminal procedure; expunction; expand record expunction for certain offenders; provide for under certain circumstances. Amends secs. 1, 3 & 4 of 1965 PA 213 (MCL 780.621 et seq.). Reported by Committee on Judiciary. SB 377 Sen. Booher Health; medical marihuana; registry information; make available to law enforcement officers upon issuance of a medical marihuana card. Amends sec. 6 of IL 1 of 2008 (MCL 333.26426). Reported by Committee on Judiciary. Senate substitute (S-2). Committee recommended I.E. 26 SB 418 Sen. Jones Health; medical marihuana; permissible causes of action under the medical marihuana law; clarify. Amends sec. 7 of 2008 IL 1 (MCL 333.26427). Reported by Committee on Judiciary. Committee recommended I.E. 27 SB 504 Sen. Jones Health; medical marihuana; dispensing medical marihuana within 1,000 feet of a church or school; prohibit. Amends sec. 4 of 2008 IL 1 (MCL 333.26424). Reported by Committee on Judiciary HB 4834 Rep. Haines139 Health; medical marihuana; photograph on medical marihuana card; require. Amends sec. 6 of 2008 IL 1 (MCL 333.26426). I.E. House, May 3, 2012. House substitute (H-5). Reported by Committee on Judiciary. Senate substitute (S-2). Committee recommended I.E. Refer to Committee of the Whole pursuant to Rule 3.701. 138 HB 4851 Rep. Cavanagh Health; medical marihuana; definition of “bona fide physician-patient relationship”; clarify. Amends sec. 3 of 2008 IL 1 (MCL 333.26423). I.E. House, May 3, 2012. House substitute (H-7). Reported by Committee on Judiciary. Senate substitute (S-1). Committee recommended I.E. Refer to Committee of the Whole pursuant to Rule 3.701. HB 4853 Rep. McBroom Criminal procedure; sentencing guidelines; sentencing guidelines for crime of selling or providing medical marihuana to unprescribed user; implement. Amends sec. 13n, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.13n). I.E. House, May 3, 2012. House substitute (H-1). Reported by Committee on Judiciary. Committee recommended I.E. Refer to Committee of the Whole pursuant to Rule 3.701. 140 HB 4856 Rep. Glardon Crimes; other; transporting medical marihuana in motor vehicle; allow under certain circumstances. Amends 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.1 - 750.568) by adding sec. 474. I.E. House, May 3, 2012. House substitute (H-3). Reported by Committee on Judiciary. Committee recommended I.E. Refer to Committee of the Whole pursuant to Rule 3.701. 141 HB 5225 Rep. Opsommer Weapons; firearms; certain procedures for purchase and possession of pistols; revise. Amends secs. 2, 5a & 5d of 1927 PA 372 (MCL 28.422 et seq.) & adds sec. 12c. I.E. House, June 13, 2012. House substitute (H-4). Reported by Committee on Judiciary. Committee recommended I.E. Refer to Committee of the Whole pursuant to Edited September 10, 2012 by Willy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelscott Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 In sb 17 it states that marijuana clubs and marijuana bars would not include properties where legal dispensing of medical marijuana occurs. what are legal properties for dispensing, do they mean caregiver homes, compassion clubs, dispensaries? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilynnboy Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 Got to love SB377. The whole reason that I am going to let my card lapse. No way do I want the Police to have my patient info, unless they NEED it. Definitely not on a routine traffic stop. Tell me if I am chicken little, but I think not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaelscott Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 Got to love SB377. The whole reason that I am going to let my card lapse. No way do I want the Police to have my patient info, unless they NEED it. Definitely not on a routine traffic stop. Tell me if I am chicken little, but I think not. hard to argue with that but hate to see it happening. montana gutted the law and registry numbers plummeted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cristinew Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 On 9 11 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free country 420 Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 so why do you think they seperated the photo on id and the unrestricted access to registry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free country 420 Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 that link you put up is bad pb any other links? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 because the picture issue was rejected from senate i believe, so it had to go back to the house,, i am guessing, that jones decided to persue it as a seperate issue. JMHO,, and yes the link is bad.. i searched that stuff up,, its definitely for tomorrow.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff from bad axe Posted September 10, 2012 Report Share Posted September 10, 2012 These bills are butchering the intent of the law. I pray we dont end up like Montana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shishka Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Wow, according to SB 244 I may be able to have my Marijuana felony cleared from my record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free country 420 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 I'm wondering if they separated them because they know that opening the registry may not pass and they want that photo on there... What do you guys am I being Nieve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trix Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Them are pretty heavy bills, game changers for sure. Anyone ever try to measure 1,000 ft, I did, good luck finding a place in the city area not 1,000 ft from a school. it's actually Quite a walk. HB 5225 Rep. Opsommer Weapons; firearms; certain procedures for purchase and possession of pistols; revise. Revised... to what? Man all of these suck for the Law and will hurt each one of us in their own ways, really bad ... Trix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmahh Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Ladies and Gentlemen, it is Time to Enforce the Privacy clause, and bring suit against the State for Breach of Privacy Laws, and Just DUMP the card all together. They can not take ANY Legalities away, but the Card is nothing but a Target. Every State that has Challenged a Registry Card on Grounds of Breach of Privacy has been a Win. No card, all the same protections under a section 4 AND 8, as they ll have to make one class (Dr Recommended like in Cali). They can NOT take away protections. This is Exactly why Snyder restored the Funds, from the General Fund to the MMMP Program, though it is Still in the Hands of LARA< which He ll be moving it back to MDCH before we know it, to pull his donkey out of a legal nightmare. Its time to DUMP the card for Safety from Profiling and Persecution.... Can it be Done, Yes It Can. And it has been in every state its been Brought to Suit in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
medicineman420 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 (edited) http://www.legislatu...c-09-11-063.htm u can goto the legislature mi calender the links arent workin Edited September 11, 2012 by medicineman420 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanutbutter Posted September 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Here is a list of phone numbers. We have about one hour left to call them: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanutbutter Posted September 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 They may have been messing with the link to prevent us from finding out what was taking place. There is no time left. CALL THEM NOW. These bills will not have to get the governors signature. They will take effect the moment the last vote is taken. If the past is any indicator, they will be administered harshly and quickly. That means, in some cases, arrests taking place the very same day. THERE WILL BE NO PAUSE TO WAIT FOR THE GOVERNORS SIGNATURE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlo Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 any info? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanutbutter Posted September 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 In sb 17 it states that marijuana clubs and marijuana bars would not include properties where legal dispensing of medical marijuana occurs. what are legal properties for dispensing, do they mean caregiver homes, compassion clubs, dispensaries? Nothing .. no location at all, has been distinctly been made legal. Notice how laws are enforced about medical marijuana? Some officials will think this means it's illegal even at the home of the caregiver. They will enforce these laws as harshly as possible, until proven otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free country 420 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 so whats the word?....any news yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free country 420 Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 i was reading SB 0377 just to see if there was anything new,i thought i had read this before mabey i did and it just dident sink in... heres the line in the bill i am talking about immediate access to information necessary to determine whether an individual in custody for possession or distribution of marihuana possession is a qualifying patient or primary caregiver. now i read this as saying that i have to be in custody for them to search the database for my name. what do you guys think? wont the search be illegal if they just search names and will they be able to search by name anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanutbutter Posted September 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 Per Brad Forrester: I was just in contact with Steve Greene from the Radio Weed Show from the floor of the Senate. None of the cannabis bills came up for a vote and the session is over for today! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanutbutter Posted September 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 One of the bills would make ANY felon not eligible to be a caregiver. Any bets about the release of those names and address of caregivers that are suddenly felons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shishka Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 How about SB 244? The one that might allow me to drop a felony? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmahh Posted September 11, 2012 Report Share Posted September 11, 2012 NO VOTE TAKEN TODAY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts