legacy Posted September 22, 2012 Report Share Posted September 22, 2012 Mods, you can delete if this is old news. i didn't see it anywhere. http://coa.courts.mi...300641o.opn.pdf To legal professionals, can you summarize this document for normal people to understand? it sounds to me that it's saying that a defendant doesn't have to meet sec4 in order to submit a sec8 defense. is that correct? does it say anything else? was this ruling beneficial for the mmma? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.