Kingpinn Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 I am hearing that there is going to be a fight over weather you have to have the signing doctor at the court proceedings or not. Even if your Doc has moved to Denver or Hong Kong you get my drift Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaveatLector Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 I am hearing that there is going to be a fight over weather you have to have the signing doctor at the court proceedings or not. Even if your Doc has moved to Denver or Hong Kong you get my drift For what? What would they need to be there for? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restorium2 Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 One of the elements of the section 8. That's why Eisenbud had to testify for Reddin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongHairBri Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 stand strong Larry...their grasping at straws, that's not gonna stick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingpinn Posted October 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 I guess so it can cost thousands for people trying to defend themselves .Something that may have to go to appeals court imagine that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knucklehead bob Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 I am hearing that there is going to be a fight over weather you have to have the signing doctor at the court proceedings or not. Even if your Doc has moved to Denver or Hong Kong you get my drift Fine & dandy . Who is responsible($$$$$) for bringing the witness to the stand ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingpinn Posted October 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 (edited) That be me in this case . Could be YOU NEXT Edited October 4, 2012 by Kingpinn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaveatLector Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 One of the elements of the section 8. That's why Eisenbud had to testify for Reddin. Redden's case wasn't sec 8, was it? Speaking of Redden, where has he been? Haven't seen him around here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingpinn Posted October 4, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 (edited) He's probably just all beaten down like me Edited October 4, 2012 by Kingpinn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knucklehead bob Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 (edited) Yes ! EDIT: Errant post Edited October 4, 2012 by knucklehead bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knucklehead bob Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 (edited) His case is ongoing in Oakland County Circuit Court and he has been taking care of several personal matters. He's probably just all beaten down like me Yes ! Edited October 4, 2012 by knucklehead bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solabeirtan Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 They are grasping KP. Doctor / Patient relationship is private, confidential and sacred. Id say you got em on a denial of "right to speedy trial", weighing in to your favor at least at this point. Bob too... Best of Luck ! keep us posted Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timmahh Posted October 4, 2012 Report Share Posted October 4, 2012 In the Debate last night, Mitt Romney may of cut his Political throat on that point. He made the clear statement, in No uncertain terms, should the Government be involved in the Dr/Pt Relationship. I HIGHLY (Punn intended) doubt this will include cannabis, medical or otherwise somehow. I would be more inclined to see Obama do something of the sort if re elected, but even that i doubt nearly as much as Romneys statement. If you understand Romney Speak, you heard the phrase he said in is had just after making that comment, "so long as I and my new AG Bill Schuette think its medicine. Stand Strong Larry. Your fight is our fight! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AmishRnot4ganja Posted October 5, 2012 Report Share Posted October 5, 2012 That be me in this case . Could be YOU NEXT Are you engaged in the "pre-trial" presentation? Is thjs where the judge determines if your case should be dismissed if you meet the requirements? Isn't it true that if you don't convince the judge then your case moves on to a jury trial where you are then guaranteed the use of the medical defense at trial according to the Supreme Court? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Freddy Posted October 5, 2012 Report Share Posted October 5, 2012 Okay here we go. 1) Trial courts are known to allow video testimony of witnesses. For the court to deny this is a denial of due process of law. 2) What would the doctor say without violating the doctor patient relationship? Not to mention the law that says that medical records are private under federal law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.