Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

...come together with an agreed agenda to form something like a grange organization to assure quality product and service? Can and should we establish criteria to membership in that organization that require members maintain standards in order to remain in good standing?

Edited by GregS
  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Any standards you set will come back and bite you in the donkey in the form of legislation that you don't want. Do you really want to agree with the powers that be that we need to be overseen?

Posted (edited)

That sounds like an outstanding idea. A professional association for caregivers would counteract charges that caregivers are incompetent or  produce an inferior product.

 

A professional associations standards would not necessarily provoke new legislation. You would merely be saying that in order to maintain membership in the association you need to conform to certain requirements as to pesticides, molds, cleanliness etc.

 

No one would be forced to maintain those standards unless they wanted to be able to say, "Member of the Better Bud Bureau".

Edited by Wild Bill
Posted (edited)

Any standards you set will come back and bite you in the donkey in the form of legislation that you don't want. Do you really want to agree with the powers that be that we need to be overseen?

 

I am not talking about a public entity, but rather a professional organization. I submit that it would go a long way to eliminate legitimacy to any argument that patients and caregivers are in any way unqualified and dangerous. These kinds of efforts would go toward defusing that argument.

Edited by GregS
Posted

That sounds like an outstanding idea. A professional association for caregivers would counteract charges that caregivers are incompetent or  produce an inferior product.

 

A professional associations standards would not necessarily provoke new legislation. You would merely be saying that in order to maintain membership in the association you need to conform to certain requirements as to pesticides, molds, cleanliness etc.

 

No one would be forced to maintain those standards unless they wanted to be able to say, "Member of the Better Bud Bureau".

 

Am enjoying one with you in mind as we speak.

Posted

I was a member of the Better Business Bureau when I owned my business. If nothing else it provides customers a starting point to find out if there have been any complaints against the company,

 

This would be particularly helpful to new patients who are still babes in the woods regarding procuring quality cannabis. They could at least have some assurance that their medicine is held to some kind of standard and not just something found growing next to the railroad tracks.

Posted

I was a member of the Better Business Bureau when I owned my business. If nothing else it provides customers a starting point to find out if there have been any complaints against the company,

 

This would be particularly helpful to new patients who are still babes in the woods regarding procuring quality cannabis. They could at least have some assurance that their medicine is held to some kind of standard and not just something found growing next to the railroad tracks.

Something along these lines would work. I've been talking about this since Jan. 2009.

 

If we had a certified board that any CG can join, but will get kicked out of if they create problems for patients, it would cover what you're talking about, I think.

Posted

Something along these lines would work. I've been talking about this since Jan. 2009.

 

If we had a certified board that any CG can join, but will get kicked out of if they create problems for patients, it would what you're talking about, I think.

How would you keep it from becoming more OPEC than BBB? I think it would create additional barriers to entry and eventually become a tool to keep prices artificially high.

 

Has quality not been getting better anyway?

Posted

Just remember that anything you agree to as rules must be accepted by everyone, and must be something that everyone could live with, if it ever became the law.

 

Yeah. We get that. You in?

Posted

So far I think this is a good idea that could become a great one.  Why could something like a better business bureau for cannabis become law?   A professional association might be a good thing.

Peace..

Posted

If you make rules that people feel are too restrictive, and then say Rick Jones gets a hold of the rules list and decides that since it came from the MMJ community it would be alright to impose it on everyone. If that happens, whoever set this up would end up being the enemy. I don't want to be the enemy and I haven't yet figured out away to prevent it from happening.

Posted

I am interested to know what it would look like.  What do you set as standards, and how do you set them?  Maybe these are some hurdles that can be overcome easily or with some/much effort?

Peace...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...