Jump to content

Dea Training Agents To Withhold Evidence


Recommended Posts

Tuesday, August 6, 2013 at 11:20 am
 
 

An exclusive report released today by Reuters outlines a long-running campaign of the federal government knowingly withholding evidence in numerous cases involving the DEA, and a highly classified multi-agency wing of the DEA known as the Special Operations Division (SOD). By withholding the true sources of their investigations, critics contend that defendants' rights to a fair trial are being compromised daily.

 

Over 10,000 law enforcement agents on the federal, state, and local level have access to a billion-document database of phone logs and internet transmissions gathered through wide ranging DEA subpoenas, arrests, and search warrants from across the country. Also included in the database, known as DICE, are tips discovered through NSA intercepts and wiretaps by foreign governments, which are then used in cases that have nothing to do with "national security".

 

Law enforcement agents say they use the information to "connect the dots". Critics argue that the program is abused in a way that allows law enforcement to line up the dots as they see fit. Furthermore, undated documents referenced in the Reuters report show that federal agents are literally being trained on how to cover up investigative trails in domestic criminal cases.

 

In a well-worn law enforcement tactic known as "Parallel Construction", agents "recreate" the investigative trail to cover up the initial source of their probe. Finn Selander, a former DEA agent from 1991-2008 and now a member of LEAP (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition) likens the "Parallel Construction" method of case-building to money laundering, saying, "You work it backwards to make it clean."

 

So if the DEA gets a wiretap tip that a certain vehicle will be transporting a large quantity of illegal drugs, they may call upon local law enforcement to find a reason, any reason, to pull that vehicle over and perform a search. Later, when the case goes to trial, the fact that the initial lead came from a DEA wiretap is never brought into evidence, and the traffic stop is made out to be a random lucky catch. In doing so, agents are withholding evidence not only from their rival defense attorneys, but from their own prosecutors and even judges.

 

By hiding this potentially exculpatory evidence, untold numbers of defendants over the years have been stripped of their Constitutional right to a fair trial. With agents admitting on the record to lying under oath to protect the DICE program, as well as conceding that DICE tips are only accurate about 60% of the time, the DEA has promised to perform an internal review on the SOD. Internal, as in, we'll never get to see it.

 

One recently retired agent was quoted as saying, "It was an amazing tool. Our big fear was that it wouldn't stay secret."

 

Reuters goes out of their way to draw the distinction between their reporting, and recent headlines surrounding Edward Snowden and the NSA wiretapping program, but if there is one glaring similarity or lesson to be learned from each storyline, it's that in 2013 and beyond, there are no more secrets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I can speak of from personal experience is that DEA agents are NOT to record interviews, instead relying on their 'notes' to record what was 'said' by all parties.  This allows them to present the information from the interview in any light they wish, while preventing the subject from refuting their version of reality.

 

Any time you are interviewed by law enforcement, and especially by the DEA, insist on recording the full interview and keeping a copy of the tape for your own records.  Recordings have saved more than one 'perp'.

 

Dr. Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I can speak of from personal experience is that DEA agents are NOT to record interviews, instead relying on their 'notes' to record what was 'said' by all parties.  This allows them to present the information from the interview in any light they wish, while preventing the subject from refuting their version of reality.

 

Any time you are interviewed by law enforcement, and especially by the DEA, insist on recording the full interview and keeping a copy of the tape for your own records.  Recordings have saved more than one 'perp'.

 

Dr. Bob

 

Very scary!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With marijuana, it's so easy for them to use this parallel construction. "I smell marijuana".

 

No real evidence necessary, just claim smell.

 

Whenever they see hippie, they smell marijuana. Whenever they see black, they smell marijuana. Whenever they see Mexican, they smell marijyana. Whenever they want to do whatever they want, they claim it smelled like marijuana.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...