bobandtorey Posted March 9, 2014 Report Share Posted March 9, 2014 LANSING (WWJ/AP) - Drugged drivers are targeted in new legislation that would require immediate jail time for repeat offenders. Republican Rep. Dan Lauwers of Brockway introduced the three-bill package on drugged driving earlier this week. The legislation would place a conditional bond on people arrested for drugged driving and mandate a temporary license for drivers who fail a roadside chemical sobriety test. Lauwers said the bills would improve law enforcement records on defendants by letting officials enter a pending chemical analysis into the Law Enforcement Information Network. “The growing incidents of drugged driving represents a clear and present danger to all Michigan residents, and immediate reforms are needed to help curb this ongoing threat,” Lauwers said in a statement. “Unlike drunken drivers, drugged drivers are currently able to avoid real punishment and stay behind the wheel longer, with often tragic results.” Lauwers pointed to a recent case involving two young men who were killed in a crash with a woman who was driving under the influence of prescription pills. Witnesses testified that the vehicle driven by 30-year-old Lisa Bergman crossed the center line, causing the collision. St. Clair County Sheriff’s Deputy Nicholas Singleton said in his testimony that Bergman “was one of the most impaired people I have ever seen operating a vehicle.” A Michigan State Police toxicology report later showed that Bergman’s blood tested positive for Oxycontin and Soma, narcotic pain killers, as well as alcohol. Lauwers said Bergman had been pulled over six times since 2008 for operating under the influence of drugs, and at the time of the accident she had two pending cases. She was sentenced earlier this month to spend 25 to 50 years in prison. “This terrible tragedy exposed the many gaps in current law as well as some practices that needed immediate attention,” he said. ”The significant backlog with the Michigan State Police Crime Lab has improved but we still need to fix the glaring gaps in state law that contributed to this horrific crash. Our hope now is to spare other Michigan families from the senseless tragedy of losing a loved one due to repeat drugged drivers.” Michigan had the 12th highest rate of drugged drivers in the country from 2006-2009, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Fatal crashes involving marijuana use tripled nationally during the previous decade, according to Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. Marijuana use alone contributed to 12 percent of 2010 crashes, representing a 300-percent increase compared to 1999. “Drugged driving has quickly become a major public safety issue, and at the very least needs to be treated with the same seriousness as drunken driving,” Lauwers said. “This legislation is a genuine step toward better protecting the people of Michigan.” http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2014/03/08/drugged-drivers-face-tougher-penalties-under-new-legislation/ Whexissilla, kneegoDob and CeptGloplebot 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregS Posted March 9, 2014 Report Share Posted March 9, 2014 What does a roadside sobriety test that would indicate cannabis impairment look like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cristinew Posted March 9, 2014 Report Share Posted March 9, 2014 Marijuana use alone contributed to 12 percent of 2010 crashes So 88 percent were not cannabis users , Seems to point out that cannabis drivers are less likely to cause an accident,. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
t-pain Posted March 9, 2014 Report Share Posted March 9, 2014 what kind of chemical sobriety test do they have for soma and oxy ? Marvin Jane 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobandtorey Posted March 9, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2014 what kind of chemical sobriety test do they have for soma and oxy ? I think they use your eyes to check if you are taking any kind of Drug's they are doing the same in Co. stepping up and informing tourist that come and use Cannabis and drive around in your rental Car you will need to see a judge before you leave for home Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phaquetoo Posted March 10, 2014 Report Share Posted March 10, 2014 (edited) I would have to think that drugged driving has been a problem about as long a drunk driving has been. I dont think It is coincedence that mmj users and the mm law have brough this on, But we have to remember, most of us were on and still are on some pretty heavy narcotics prescribed by your dr. or friend for cash! Im just saying how mj effects me while driving, I believe I can drive very good and will pass all road subrioty tests and of course the breathalizer! The only problem I have had was I do get tired and seem to get that road trance going! When I drove on my normal dose of narcos and other rx's my dr's have prescribed, I have fallen asleep at the wheel, I have had many close calls and I know I had absolutly no biz on the road, Totaly my fault I dont work and have to realy be any where but the school for the kids and its 2 miles from home for me. Bottom line is I dont realy beleive mmj is no where near the threat of alcohol, narcotics, even some of the less potent pain pills, but I dont beleive that anything that alters your thinking or slows your responses while driving should be out right legal,,,,mmj should not be treated the same as alcohol and heavy rx's in the court rooms! Personaly I would rather drive behind a car full of folks smoking mj than a car of people drinking! Peace Edited March 10, 2014 by phaquetoo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imiubu Posted March 10, 2014 Report Share Posted March 10, 2014 LANSING (WWJ/AP) - Drugged drivers are targeted in new legislation that would require immediate jail time for repeat offenders. Fatal crashes involving marijuana use tripled nationally during the previous decade, according to Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2014/03/08/drugged-drivers-face-tougher-penalties-under-new-legislation/ This says "involving" which leads me to believe they are again misleading the public. bobandtorey, I wood and Norby 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Bob Posted March 10, 2014 Report Share Posted March 10, 2014 The main cause of drug impaired driving is anti-histamines. Just thought we should put this in perspective. Wild Bill 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdiamond Posted March 10, 2014 Report Share Posted March 10, 2014 This says "involving" which leads me to believe they are again misleading the public.Exactly because THC was found in the drunk persons blood that obviously was the cause not the 24 drinks they were served at a local tavern this is just more nonsensical Republican overreaching to further criminalize cannabis in the state of Michigan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregS Posted March 11, 2014 Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 I plan to lean on the government to perform studies with the money the LARA fund balance shows in excess of operating costs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobandtorey Posted March 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2014 I plan to lean on the government to perform studies with the money the LARA fund balance shows in excess of operating costs. Great idea please come back and let us all know how it worked out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThespiritofEliyahu Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 (edited) If you are a legit medical card holder and not consuming in your vehicle you should be fine. The Michigan Supreme Court is already on your side if you are not impaired. The simple presence of Cannabis in ones system isn't probable cause to detain a patient under Michigan law. That is what I got out of it. Feel free to point out where I'm wrong. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/22/michigan-marijuana-driving-supreme-court-dui_n_3320216.html LANSING (WWJ/AP) - Drugged drivers are targeted in new legislation that would require immediate jail time for repeat offenders. Republican Rep. Dan Lauwers of Brockway introduced the three-bill package on drugged driving earlier this week. The legislation would place a conditional bond on people arrested for drugged driving and mandate a temporary license for drivers who fail a roadside chemical sobriety test. Lauwers said the bills would improve law enforcement records on defendants by letting officials enter a pending chemical analysis into the Law Enforcement Information Network. “The growing incidents of drugged driving represents a clear and present danger to all Michigan residents, and immediate reforms are needed to help curb this ongoing threat,” Lauwers said in a statement. “Unlike drunken drivers, drugged drivers are currently able to avoid real punishment and stay behind the wheel longer, with often tragic results.” Lauwers pointed to a recent case involving two young men who were killed in a crash with a woman who was driving under the influence of prescription pills. Witnesses testified that the vehicle driven by 30-year-old Lisa Bergman crossed the center line, causing the collision. St. Clair County Sheriff’s Deputy Nicholas Singleton said in his testimony that Bergman “was one of the most impaired people I have ever seen operating a vehicle.” A Michigan State Police toxicology report later showed that Bergman’s blood tested positive for Oxycontin and Soma, narcotic pain killers, as well as alcohol. Lauwers said Bergman had been pulled over six times since 2008 for operating under the influence of drugs, and at the time of the accident she had two pending cases. She was sentenced earlier this month to spend 25 to 50 years in prison. “This terrible tragedy exposed the many gaps in current law as well as some practices that needed immediate attention,” he said. ”The significant backlog with the Michigan State Police Crime Lab has improved but we still need to fix the glaring gaps in state law that contributed to this horrific crash. Our hope now is to spare other Michigan families from the senseless tragedy of losing a loved one due to repeat drugged drivers.” Michigan had the 12th highest rate of drugged drivers in the country from 2006-2009, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Fatal crashes involving marijuana use tripled nationally during the previous decade, according to Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. Marijuana use alone contributed to 12 percent of 2010 crashes, representing a 300-percent increase compared to 1999. “Drugged driving has quickly become a major public safety issue, and at the very least needs to be treated with the same seriousness as drunken driving,” Lauwers said. “This legislation is a genuine step toward better protecting the people of Michigan.” http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2014/03/08/drugged-drivers-face-tougher-penalties-under-new-legislation/ Edited March 14, 2014 by ThespiritofEliyahu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobandtorey Posted March 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 For example, Washington has set a legal limit for the blood concentration of THC at 5 ng/ml. See Wash Rev Code 46.61.502(1)(b). Notably, defendant’s THC level was 10 ng/ml. 22 While neither party raised the issue, we conclude that the MMMA’s enactment without republishing MCL 257.625(8) did not run afoul of Const 1963, art 4, § 25, which states So his level was 10ng even after he said he used 4-5 hours before diving i think Lansing maybe trying to fix that and we all know it won't help the sick people Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free420country Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 Problem I see with that is that even three or four days later you can have 5 nanograms...ive seen it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phaquetoo Posted March 14, 2014 Report Share Posted March 14, 2014 It once took me 90 days to get thc out of my body, I was in a program and did not use, I had to be tested every week in the program, it honestly took 90 days before there was no sign of mj in my urine screens! at the time I was at my heavy weight fighting weight lol...6ft and 238 lbs! The program I was in was not court ordered, it was something I was doing to save my 1st marriage (what a waiste of time lol) So yea they most def need something that can tell when you last used, or we can get drugged driving weeks after we used, just saying, I dont go weeks w/o but I do wait until i get home if I have things to do! Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Wilson Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 It almost always comes down to, how you are perceived by the LEO when he looks you in the eye. If you can speak normally with some intelligence and do not appear impaired, you most likely won't get hauled to the hospital for a drug test (assuming you were NOT pulled over for weaving all over and driving dangerously or involved in an accident). The guy (or girl) who drives a clean, well maintained, not stinky car, who dresses, talks and looks normal will usually get a pass (even if they are high). The dirty unmaintained cars with the long hairs and bumper stickers and the people who talk funny and look funny, will not get a break (even if they are completely sober). Not fair, I know. But that is reality. Perception is everything. Justice should be blind but it usually is not. mibrains, phaquetoo and I wood 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobandtorey Posted April 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 Wild Bill and pergamum362 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phaquetoo Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 For example, Washington has set a legal limit for the blood concentration of THC at 5 ng/ml. See Wash Rev Code 46.61.502(1)(b). Notably, defendant’s THC level was 10 ng/ml. 22 While neither party raised the issue, we conclude that the MMMA’s enactment without republishing MCL 257.625(8) did not run afoul of Const 1963, art 4, § 25, which states So his level was 10ng even after he said he used 4-5 hours before diving i think Lansing maybe trying to fix that and we all know it won't help the sick people I wonder how many politicians are popping oxci's and xanny's all day to get thru their long day of ripping off the people that voted for them? They dont even consider morphine patches or vicodens or anything but mmj, many many things are more dangerious to be driving on,,man I can just see some one abusing their narco's doing the headbob while driving! Im not even saying we should be able to smoke and drive but why do we get treated differently than people with real rx adictions? Peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobandtorey Posted April 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 I wonder how many politicians are popping oxci's and xanny's all day to get thru their long day of ripping off the people that voted for them? They dont even consider morphine patches or vicodens or anything but mmj, many many things are more dangerious to be driving on,,man I can just see some one abusing their narco's doing the headbob while driving! Im not even saying we should be able to smoke and drive but why do we get treated differently than people with real rx adictions? Peace Thanks Jim i'am glad you and i can see the differences in RX and cannabis heard bobbing some may call Noning out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pergamum362 Posted April 6, 2014 Report Share Posted April 6, 2014 25 to 50 years? Why not rehab and a smaller sentence. This person obviously has a problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GregS Posted April 6, 2014 Report Share Posted April 6, 2014 I can hardly begin to tell you the number of times I've been pulled over or engaged in a conversation with a police officer in public and they had no idea. I make it a point to say hi to them, especially when I'm toasted. They are clueless imbeciles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pergamum362 Posted April 6, 2014 Report Share Posted April 6, 2014 It only takes a hsd to be a cop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.