Jump to content

Medical Marijuana-Related Charges Filed Against Grand Rapids Doctor, Others In Alleged Drug Ring


Recommended Posts

GRAND RAPIDS, MI – Police say a Grand Rapids doctor certified patients to use medical marijuana without providing a physical examination, reviewing patients’ medical records and often without meeting the patient at all.

The allegations against Dr. Gregory Kuldanek and others are contained in search warrant affidavits recently unsealed in U.S. District Court in an investigation into accusations of marijuana growing and drug trafficking.

The defendants contend they complied with the state’s medical marijuana law.

Attorneys have asked a judge to toss evidence obtained during what they considered illegal searches of homes in the Grand Rapids area. The attorney who filed the initial motion to suppress evidence thinks the government retaliated by trying to have his client locked up pending trial.

Kuldanek, of East Paris Internal Medicine, is accused with nine others of conspiring to manufacture 100 or more marijuana plants. He is also indicted on a charge of maintaining drug-involved premises.

“Kuldanek facilitates the recruitment of nominee patients by using his Michigan Physician License to certify that people recruited by other members of the (drug-trafficking organization) as ‘patients’ qualify for a marijuana card by reason of a serious debilitating medical condition …,” wrote Patrick Frederick, a Kent County sheriff’s deputy assigned as a task force officer for the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

“It is apparent by the same dates appearing on multiple physician certification forms that Gregory Kuldanek has signed ‘stacks’ or multiples of ‘(Michigan Medical Marijuana Act) Physician Certification’ forms saying he has conducted ‘in-person medical evaluations’ of patients he has never met.”

Defense attorney Kelly Lambert III represents Kuldanek and says Kuldanek has pleaded not guilty to the allegations.

"I think that’s the proper plea for him to make.” Lambert said.

He said that the case is “far more complicated and complex than meets the eye.” If his client played any role, it was “minor,” Lambert said.

Kuldanek is free on $15,000 unsecured bond.

The government obtained the names of 66 patients and caregivers linked to the alleged drug-trafficking organization by issuing a grand jury subpoena to the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.

Almost all of the patients and caregivers had received medical certification from Kuldanek, police said. The government said the organization recruited “patients” to apply for medical marijuana cards.

 

Frederick said the DEA and Kent Area Narcotics Enforcement Team have conducted a joint investigation into what he called the Betty Lee Jenkins and Phillip Walsh drug-trafficking organization, or “Jenkins-Walsh DTO.”

 

 

 

In November 2013, police investigated an alleged marijuana-manufacturing operation run by Kathleen Anne Rosengren in the 7000 block of Cascade Road SE. Rosengren told police she provided Jenkins with two large garbage bags of harvested marijuana that Jenkins took to her home in the 2000 block of Forest Hill Avenue SE, the DEA said.

Police used a search warrant at the Forest Hill home. Police found documents that Jenkins owned and paid for utilities at two four-unit apartment buildings in Gaines Township. Police found six more marijuana operations there, agents said in court records.

In all, police seized 467 plants and 18 pounds of processed marijuana from the eight grow operations, the DEA said in court records. The marijuana had an estimated street value of $431,000

Police say the group also grew marijuana in the 13000 block of Seven Mile Road NE in northern Kent County and 1000 block of Alden Nash Road in Lowell Township.

The government is seeking a judgment of $1,293,600, which represents proceeds of the alleged conspiracy, and is seeking forfeiture of properties where marijuana was grown, records show.

Walsh’s attorney, R. Vincent Green, said he did not want to comment before he had the chance to talk to Walsh on Thursday. Green said his client believed he complied with the law.

Attorney J. Nicholas Bostic, representing Jenkins, suggested the government retaliated against his client after he filed a motion to suppress evidence. Jenkins was the only one re-arrested when the government filed a superseding indictment, he said.

“We will argue in Court about whether they re-arrested her and sought her detention in retaliation for her motion,” Bostic wrote in an email to The Grand Rapids Press/MLive.

He wants her statements to police thrown out, too. Police said she discussed the alleged operation.

In a court filing, he said: “The execution of these warrants and the preparation of the required returns was sloppy to say the least and very questionable in more sinister terms. Indeed, the only reason this case was submitted for federal prosecution is because defendant’s conduct was lawful under state law,” Bostic wrote in court documents.

He said his client was in “full compliance” with the state’s medical marijuana law.

“(Police) seized items that were lawfully possessed under state law and exceeded the scope of their authority thereby violating the Fourth Amendment.”

He said police obtained the initial search warrant, for Rosengren’s residence, “armed with nothing but their anonymous information and a claim that (police) smelled marijuana on the porch … .”

Also accused with Jenkins, Walsh, Kuldanek and Rosengren of conspiracy to manufacture 100 or more marijuana plants are Steven Hawkins, Adam Paul Rumpf, Parker Wilcoulter Smith, John Christopher Pacencia, Cynthia Wessley, and Todd Stephen Greene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government obtained the names of 66 patients and caregivers linked to the alleged drug-trafficking organization by issuing a grand jury subpoena to the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.

 

That's how the Daisy Chains, (Have a Caregiver, Be a Caregiver) are uncovered. With a grand jury subpoena, and a simple computer program, the chains are all on one nice, neat, long list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government obtained the names of 66 patients and caregivers linked to the alleged drug-trafficking organization by issuing a grand jury subpoena to the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.

 

That's how the Daisy Chains, (Have a Caregiver, Be a Caregiver) are uncovered. With a grand jury subpoena, and a simple computer program, the chains are all on one nice, neat, long list.

It is illegal how? In federal court sure. Under state law not so much. Federal law will fall any time now.

Edited by GregS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

if I provide mj to my patient for the purpose of providing it to his patients, rather than alleviating his own symptoms, and truth be told, I would be in violation of our Act, or something like that I heard.

Ditto!  I agree.

Edited by Willy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What we are, I think , talking about is a system where all participants are patients who are caregivers for other patients who are caregivers for other patients &c. All of those patients are acquiring cannabis from their caregivers who are providing it to relieve the patients' debilitating conditions in accordance with the law. If a qualifying LEO were to infiltrate one of these, they would find that they can obtain cannabis from their caregiver as a patient. If they are a caregiver they can provide their patients with what they can procure, most usually, but not always, by growing it. They can obtain and possess 2.5 oz for each patient they are connected to from any source. If that source is on top of their game they will have entered into a private agreement to act as caregiver to that patient, requiring the other party to sign it and have it notarized, agreeing to engage in a cg/pt relationship that intends to meet the requirements of the Affirmative Defense as supplemental to registration, which nails down intent to comply with the law. If LEO sells to someone s/he is not permitted to sell to, they have broken the law. Again, it does not matter where a patient or the patient's caregiver gets his or her goods. Once it is in their possession they are home free. Only if someone is too sloppy to stay within necessary protocols (possession limits, chain of custody, talking out of school) and sells without a private agreement and/or connected registration they can find trouble. Staying out of trouble is as simple as a caregiver asking if the purchase by his/her patient is intended to relieve the patient's debilitating condition or symptoms in accordance with the act. There is only one right answer, and if you don't hear it you simply laugh and move along. If the question does not come up it is not of concern to the caregiver.

 

Sequential registration or something like it might be a more adept term than daisy chain, although both have their own special quaintness and are protected activity. If someone can point up how it is not, please say so.

 

Simply put, we do not sell cannabis to anyone other than patients who have assigned and documented us as their caregiver in a relationship that both have agreed to based upon a documented bona fide physician statement. Period.

Edited by GregS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share



×
×
  • Create New...