Cloud 45. Gaylord Raided......again

[beourbud]

Shut em All Down

 

When you get a legal model that works, draft a bill, get sigs/petitions

 

Til then. Get Off Our Grass

Edited April 22, 2016 by beourbud

[+Malamute]

I mean, dispensaries are just black market dealers. Corner dime bag dealers.

 

I see no difference between dispensaries and black market pot dealers except the black market dealers aren't so dumb as to open a storefront, put a bullseye on their foreheads, and pretend to be legal by giving caregivers a bad name.

[beourbud]

There is No difference, they Are the new Black Market

 

Shut em Down..

Edited April 22, 2016 by beourbud

[mibrains]

A law will need to be passed to regulate dispensaries to protect patients.

 

Period.

 

Until then, get a Caregiver.

 

:-)

I agree.

 

Sorta.

 

A law will need to be passed to protect the industry as it protects people as individuals and does not favor any one particular person or entity to be able to legally gain total market control.

 

That being said...

 

The law currently protects patients to procure cannabis from any source.

[+Malamute]

Well, I have no issues with the black market personally.

 

I have issues with how dispensaries  operate, their over market prices,  how they have pretended to be registered caregivers, and they incessant drumbeat to throw patients and caregivers under the bus for their own advancement.

[+Malamute]

I agree.

 

Sorta.

 

A law will need to be passed to protect the industry as it protects people as individuals and does not favor any one particular person or entity to be able to legally gain total market control.

 

That being said...

 

The law currently protects patients to procure cannabis from any source.

 

Your thinking is very narrow there.

[mibrains]

I mean, dispensaries are just black market dealers. Corner dime bag dealers.

 

I see no difference between dispensaries and black market pot dealers except the black market dealers aren't so dumb as to open a storefront, put a bullseye on their foreheads, and pretend to be legal by giving caregivers a bad name.

I disagree

 

However that being said..

 

As a patient I have the protected right to choose.

 

Many patients use and support dispensaries so perhaps the judgement should be left up to them?

[mibrains]

Your thinking is very narrow there.

How so?

[mibrains]

Well, I have no issues with the black market personally.

 

I have issues with how dispensaries  operate, their over market prices,  how they have pretended to be registered caregivers, and they incessant drumbeat to throw patients and caregivers under the bus for their own advancement.

All of them do that?

 

All dispensaries are evil your saying?

 

No sterotyping?

[mibrains]

Simple fact?

 

Dispensaries are market driven.

 

Patients are the ones deciding

[+Malamute]

I look at the big picture mibrains.  I will not allow the majority to be harmed by the minority.

[mibrains]

We are not discussing people off the street or children getting into supply we are discussing patient choice.

 

So what do the patients choose?

[mibrains]

I look at the big picture mibrains.  I will not allow the majority to be harmed by the minority.

I totally agree.

 

Absolutly and without question.

[+Malamute]

Yes yes, dispensaries are about the money. We all know that.

 

Can a patient buy there? sure wtf.

 

 Now think a little bigger mibrains.

[beourbud]

All of them do that?

All dispensaries are evil your saying?

No sterotyping?

Yes, All dispensaries are illegal/evil

 

Yes they all conspire to scheme and deceive

 

Yes, they launder cash

 

Yes, the encourage criminal activity.

 

Yes they import out of state drugs

 

Yes they are a scourge to the MMMP

Edited April 22, 2016 by beourbud

[mibrains]

Yes yes, dispensaries are about the money. We all know that.

 

Can a patient buy there? sure wtf.

 

 Now think a little bigger mibrains.

That's it?

 

Dispensaries are about the money?

 

I should think bigger?

 

OK

 

Thanks mal.

 

Your opinion is noted.

 

Back to the subject..

 

Patient choice.

[t-pain]

this all gets fixed if LARA makes instant online caregiver changes a thing.

 

no changes to law required.

[mibrains]

Yes, All dispensaries are illegal/evil

Yes they all conspire to scheme and deceive

Yes, they launder cash

Yes, the encourage criminal activity.

Yes they import out of state drugs

Yes they are a scourge to the MMMP

They do?

 

Then why do patients go there?

 

Why can they exist in a capitalism market?

 

If they are evil then would not the market drive them out?

[+Malamute]

I suppose that would help tpain, but it would inhibit small sales due to cost.

[mibrains]

this all gets fixed if LARA makes instant online caregiver changes a thing.no changes to law required.

Bingo..

 

Yes instant registry would solve the elephant in the room dilema...

[+Malamute]

Um, Mibrains,... the capitalist market doesn't work the way you think there aye.

 

In your theory of capitalism, Comcast shouldn't exist.  Heh.

[beourbud]

They do?

Then why do patients go there?

Why can they exist in a capitalism market?

If they are evil then would not the market drive them out?

You might make the same argument for a crack house.

 

It's All about the money.

[mibrains]

It also does not address the issue of a registered patient who has a named caregiver they are mostly happy with however they want to sample other exotic strains...

 

It would allow p2p if a p has no c. But if a p has a designated c the it would fold the system.

 

I think most patients have or should have a caregiver.

 

I also think they need to be able to "shop around"

[+Malamute]

Bingo..

 

Yes instant registry would solve the elephant in the room dilema...

 

 

 And here is the real elephant in the room UNFORTINATELY:

 

At what cost? All these ideas around commercialism always come with a cost to patients and caregivers.

 

 At what cost?  How many more patients and caregiver arrests are ok as long as we get commercial pot?

[+Malamute]

It also does not address the issue of a registered patient who has a named caregiver they are mostly happy with however they want to sample other exotic strains...

 

It would allow p2p if a p has no c. But if a p has a designated c the it would fold the system.

 

I think most patients have or should have a caregiver.

 

I also think they need to be able to "shop around"

 

 

 What about if we allowed pt/cg's  to give away marijuana? Patients to have 2 caregvers or cg's to have ten patients?