Jump to content

Trump Indicated Where He Stands On Medical Marijuana For The First Time Since He Took Office


Recommended Posts

Trump indicated where he stands on medical marijuana for the first time since he took office

 

President Donald Trump issued his first statement on medical marijuana since he took office.

 

Trump on Friday signed a $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill that will keep the federal government funded through September 30.

 

The congressionally approved bill includes a rider — the Rohrabacher - Blumenauer Amendment — that disallows the Department of Justice and the Drug Enforcement Agency from using federal funds to prosecute medical marijuana businesses in states where medical marijuana is legal.

 

Marijuana is illegal at the federal level, though 29 states have varying degrees of medical marijuana legalization on the books. The amendment doesn't extend to recreational marijuana, which is legal in eight states.

 

Trump, who has stayed mum on the topic of marijuana since the election, finally gave an indication as to where he stands on the issue in his statement after he signed the bill:

 

"Division B, section 537 provides that the Department of Justice may not use any funds to prevent implementation of medical marijuana laws by various States and territories. I will treat this provision consistently with my constitutional responsibility to take care that the laws be faithfully executed."

 

Tom Angell, the founder of Marijuana Majority, an advocacy group, told Business Insider he thinks that Trump's statement is the federal government's way of "asserting their right" to go after certain medical marijuana businesses if they choose to at a later date.

 

"[M]y read is it's basically saying they reserve the right to do whatever they want and enforce prohibition regardless of the statutory prohibition on doing so," Angell said, though he doesn't think it necessarily indicates a federal crackdown on medical marijuana is coming.

 

A federal court — the 9th circuit, which has blocked two of Trump's high-profile executive actions — ruled last year that the amendment protects patients and providers acting in accordance with state medical marijuana laws, despite the Justice Department insisting the opposite, notes Angell. 

 

Michael Collins, the deputy director of the Drug Policy Alliance, said in an email that Trump continues to send "mixed messages" on marijuana.

 

"After stating during the campaign that he was '100%' in support of medical marijuana, he now issues a signing statement casting doubt on whether his Administration will adhere to a congressional rider that stops DOJ from going after medical marijuana programs," Collins said. 

 

"The uncertainty is deeply disconcerting for patients and providers, and we urge the Administration to clarify their intentions immediately," Collins added.

 

Robert Capecchi, the director of federal policies for the Marijuana Policy Project, said in an email that Congress is growing "increasingly comfortable" with states adopting medical and recreational marijuana policies.

 

"Unfortunately, spending prohibitions like these expire at the end of the fiscal year, so there is still a need for a long-term solution," Capecchi added.

 

Jeff Sessions, the attorney general, told Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper during a private meeting in April that prosecuting state-legal marijuana businesses wouldn't be a priority for the Justice Department.

 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-indicated-where-stands-medical-041500503.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"Division B, section 537 provides that the Department of Justice may not use any funds to prevent implementation of medical marijuana laws by various States and territories. I will treat this provision consistently with my constitutional responsibility to take care that the laws be faithfully executed."

what the flower does that mean?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a growing movement to encourage House Rep. Bobby Rush (who is an old man) to decline a run for reelection in Illinois' 1st congressional district and allow Obama to run for that seat. If elected in 2018, Obama would likely become the Speaker of the House if democrats could pick up about 35 more seats. Wouldn't that be some fun political drama?

 

But right now there is no point in removing Trump and his thugs from office because the line of succession is equally bad. That said, I'd still rather see Paul Ryan as the president of the United States instead of Trump or Pence. Or if it goes as deep as Orin Hatch I'd be OK with that too.

 

If I had to pick a republican for POTUS, I'd go with John McCain. But that isn't a realistic option.

 

Ideally, I'd like to see non-republicans flip the house and senate in 2018, Elijah Cummings becomes speaker of the house, Trump and Pence are simultaneously thrown out of office, and Cummings becomes the POTUS. My second choice would be Matt Cartwright, honorable gentleman representing PA's 17th congressional district.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a growing movement to encourage House Rep. Bobby Rush (who is an old man) to decline a run for reelection in Illinois' 1st congressional district and allow Obama to run for that seat. If elected in 2018, Obama would likely become the Speaker of the House if democrats could pick up about 35 more seats. Wouldn't that be some fun political drama?

 

But right now there is no point in removing Trump and his thugs from office because the line of succession is equally bad. That said, I'd still rather see Paul Ryan as the president of the United States instead of Trump or Pence. Or if it goes as deep as Orin Hatch I'd be OK with that too.

 

If I had to pick a republican for POTUS, I'd go with John McCain. But that isn't a realistic option.

 

Ideally, I'd like to see non-republicans flip the house and senate in 2018, Elijah Cummings becomes speaker of the house, Trump and Pence are simultaneously thrown out of office, and Cummings becomes the POTUS. My second choice would be Matt Cartwright, honorable gentleman representing PA's 17th congressional district.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share



×
×
  • Create New...