Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
KLAW Blog

LARA-MMFLA-Can the Department clarify the intent of Rule 24(2)(c)

Recommended Posts

Can the Department clarify the intent of Rule 24(2)(c)?

 

Rule 24(2)(c) of the Emergency Administrative Rules filed on December 4, 2017 pertains to operation at a same location commonly referred to as co-location. For background purposes, pursuant to section 205 of the MMFLA a municipality has the authority to adopt an ordinance to limit the type or number of marihuana facilities within their boundaries. For clarification purposes, the intent behind Rule 24(2)(c) is that the applicant cannot circumvent the municipal ordinance or zoning regulation, which may limit the type or number of marihuana facilities under section 205 of the act, simply by operating at a same location.


Komorn Law has represented numerous clients through the legal chaos of starting up a business in the Michigan Medical Marihuana Industry.

Contact Us For More Information.

800-656-3557

The post LARA-MMFLA-Can the Department clarify the intent of Rule 24(2)(c) appeared first on Komorn Law.

View the full article

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...