The State Michigan V Obama - The Rights We Lose

[freemannabis]

Recent news on Thomas Law v Obama.

 

Here's an excerpt:

 

"The Obama administration’s strategy has been to try to delay the legal cases as long as possible. In order to bring a case in federal court, a plaintiff must have “standing”—a personal, concrete legal interest, as opposed to a generalized grievance. The Obama administration asserted no individual could have standing to challenge the mandate until 2014.

 

The Obama rationale would delay Supreme Court consideration by at least four years, by which time Obama might be able to pack the Supreme Court with justices who pass his litmus test of being willing to uphold the unprecedented federal law."

 

(Hmm ... now, why does that tactic sound familiar, eh?!)

 

 

http://www.heartland.org/healthpolicy-news.org/article/28637/ObamaCare_Constitutionality_Upheld_in_Michiganfor_Now.html

 

(By the way, was I the only one with "access denied" problems since yesterday?)

 

 

End The War on Freedom.

 

FREE The CURE!

[freemannabis]

view check