These Are Your Rights Being "tested" This Will Make Or Break Local Government's

[aegasaway]

 

From an article in the Grand Rapids Press RE: medical marijuana documents. The federal government in this case being the DEA. Michigan’s Department of Community Health told the DEA “No,” good for them, but naturally the DEA is bringing to bear the full coercive force of the State against Michigan’s Department of Community Health, and a judge will listen to arguments January 12th and decide whether or not the State of Michigan has any right to withhold the information and shield the seven unnamed individuals from this intrusion. - Judge to hear DEA request to obtain state medical-marijuana records

 

ALL MMP PATIENTS/CAREGIVERS, THIS IS ABOUT THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE TO HIT THE TABLE SINCE THE NOV. 4TH VOTE IN 2008 FOR OUR COMMUNITY.

 

IF YOU VALUE YOUR VOTED IN RIGHTS -BE THERE IN GRAND RAPIDS ON THE 12TH JAN.2011

 

REMEMBER-THE PEOPLE @ MDCH ARE THE GOOD GUYS,LETS LET THEM KNOW WE SUPPORT THEM!!!!!!!!!

 

IF THE DEA IS DISALLOWED THIS THEY CAN NOT MAKE US COMPLY WITH LOCAL REGISTER / ORDINANCE'S. BE THERE,SHOW YOUR SUPPORT,BRING A FRIEND,MAKE A SIGN TO CARRY ,WARE A SHIRT TO SHOW SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL MMP TELL THE WORLD WHAT THE FEDS ARE TRYING TO DO -TO YOU AND THE STATE OF MICHIGAN !!!!!!

 

(IF THE FEDS CANT HAVE OUR RECORDS,LOCAL GOV CANT HAVE THEM EITHER!)

 

IF THE STORY IS RIGHT,THEY WANT A "DRUG BUST" THIS IS MEDICINE,

 

NO MATTER HOW SICK,BAD WEATHER-JUST BE THERE!

 

PEACE OUT

 

"JUST AN OLD HIPPY"

 

Western District of Michigan Courthouse Location

 

Grand Rapids - District Headquarters

 

U.S. Magistrate Judge Hugh Brenneman

 

580 Federal Building

110 Michigan Street N.W.

Grand Rapids, MI 49503

 

 

 

In re Grand Jury Subpoena for THCF Medical Clinic Records

(2007): The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington quashed a subpoena directed to the State of Oregon to reveal information about 17 patients receiving medical marijuana.The court found that the subpoena issued by the federal government to prove criminal violations against a medical marijuana clinic was unreasonable, since the government did not have strong need for the information and the state would be violating its own laws regarding confidentiality to reveal the information sought, which, in addition, would deter medical marijuana patients from participating the the state's medical marijuana program. Balancing these interests, the court concluded that the subpoena should be quashed

 

Fed.Rules Cr.Proc.Rule 17©(2), 18 U.S.C.A.; West's Or.Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 192.496(1),

475.331(a, b); OAR 333-008-0050

http://www.safeaccessnow.org/downloads/landmark.in.re.grand.jury.pdf

Hey Joe, can the MMMA community come out and play?

"Newbie" Not A Chance CARDHOLDER #64