Springfield, Missouri City Council Doesn't Want Marijuana Vote

[c2288420]

Springfield, Missouri City Council Doesn't Want Marijuana Vote

 

By Marijuana Polic..., Tue, September 25, 2012

 

When a dedicated group of activists hoping to reform Springfield, Missouri’s punitive marijuana laws turned in thousands of signatures they had collected fair and square, they thought the next step would be for voters in Springfield to decide whether or not to support their proposal. In other words, they thought the initiative process works like common sense says it should. They were wrong. What happened next is an example of disenfranchisement so egregious it belongs in a work of fiction.

The Springfield City Council, as is their legal right, went ahead and passed the ordinance, meaning it would not be placed on the November ballot. Their stated reason for this was that they didn’t want the city to have to front the cost of printing the issue on general election ballots. In other words, they were just trying to save the city some money, they said. Normally, at this point, the story would be over. But this is Springfield.

Immediately after the council passed the ordinance, they voted to “table” it, so they could amend the law to their liking. Some wanted to raise the $150 fine, which they thought was too low. Others wanted to remove a provision establishing “citizen oversight commission.” It gets worse.

After 150 people showed up to offer their testimony—the overwhelming majority in support of the original ordinance—four of the nine councilmembers moved forward with a plan to repeal the entire ordinance, stripping citizens of their fundamental right to vote on the proposal. Here’s a quote from one of those councilmembers, and I promise I’m not making this up: “I’m going to support passing, and then gutting, the entire ordinance,” added Councilman Jeff Seifried. “This is the fiscally responsible way to do business.”

Last night those oligarchs councilmembers followed through on their intentions and repealed the ordinance. The petitioners from Show Me Cannabis Regulation who gathered the signatures are assessing their options now. They have 30 days to gather more signatures to repeal the council’s vote (which, of course, could then be overturned by the council). More likely, they’ll sue to challenge the council’s action as violating the city charter’s initiative language.

Either way, one thing is clear: the Springfield, Missouri City Council does not care about your voting rights.

 

?????????????????????????????

 

Regards,

C

Edited October 2, 2012 by c2288420

[t-pain]

every level of government is corrupted.

welcome to democracy.

[Fat Freddy]

Years ago i lived near springfield and I can tell you they are old fashioned. The phrase Show me really applies there.

What they tend to forget is that Missouri once supplied a lot of the hemp for this war effort during WWII.

Looks like some recall petitions will be circulating too.