Schuette's Suggested Changes

[legacy]

http://www.michigancannabispatients.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=3438

 

Section 3\c - Why is BS so intent on wanting the grow site completely enlcosed? Is it to trip up CGs on a technicality, or is there actually some benefit?

 

Section 3\f - Since the COA re-engineering of the Act, why would he want to eliminate transfers from medical use?

 

Section 4\a - Throughout the markup, he inserts the word "valid" before "registry id card". Does this mean that (sham $100 LARA processing cost) renewals are currently unnecessary?

[jhaz]

http://www.michigancannabispatients.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=3438

 

Section 3\c - Why is BS so intent on wanting the grow site completely enlcosed? Is it to trip up CGs on a technicality, or is there actually some benefit?

 

Section 3\f - Since the COA re-engineering of the Act, why would he want to eliminate transfers from medical use?

 

Section 4\a - Throughout the markup, he inserts the word "valid" before "registry id card". Does this mean that (sham $100 LARA processing cost) renewals are currently unnecessary?

warrentless searches..no longer able to drive a automobile..i like how they put anyone with a felony cannot be a caregiver..before it was including drugs..so now if someone has a felony from 20 years ago non drug related and they dont have a care giver there immediately excluded from mm benefits ...lol..kinda funny my job im allowed to handle mutli milliondollar deals and access to personal records ss # banking info etc yet i cant be trusted to grow my own marijuana..lol...go figure

[+420Atheist]

 

Section 3\f - Since the COA re-engineering of the Act, why would he want to eliminate transfers from medical use?

 

 

Great question. Maybe he is trying to outlaw all transfers even between CG and named patient.