Cannabis and Taxes – The challenges of non-deductible expenses

[KLAW Blog]

What is Section 280 E?

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code forbids businesses from deducting otherwise ordinary business expenses from gross income associated with the “trafficking” of Schedule I or II substances, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act.

Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code forbids businesses from deducting otherwise ordinary business expenses from gross income associated with the “trafficking” of Schedule I or II substances, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act. The IRS has subsequently applied Section 280E to state-legal cannabis businesses, since cannabis is still a Schedule I substance.

Reagan Era Law

Created during the Reagan Administration, Section 280E originated from a 1981 court case in which a convicted cocaine trafficker asserted his right under federal tax law to deduct ordinary business expenses. In 1982, Congress created 280E to prevent other drug dealers from following suit. It states that no deductions should be allowed on any amount “in carrying on any trade or business if such trade or business consists of trafficking in controlled substances.”

With 23 states and the District of Columbia now allowing some form of legal marijuana, 280E is applied to state-regulated cannabis businesses more often than it is to the types of illegal drug dealers that the provision was intended to penalize.

What types of business expenses are under 280E?

• Employee salaries
• Payments to contractors
• Utility costs
• Internet
• Health insurance premiums
• Advertising costs
• Repairs and maintenance
• Rental fees
• Security
• and more

What deductions are challenged?

• General and administrative costs (bookkeeping, legal expenses, technology costs)
• State excise tax
• Storage of cannabis
• Product Purchases
• Product Depreciation
• Product Losses
• Theft
• and more

2015 IRS Memorandum

2018 US Tax Court

The Tax Court decision in Patients Mutual Assistance Collective Corporation d.b.a. Harborside Health Center v. Commissioner held that the medical marijuana dispensary could not deduct business expenses despite operating its business legally under California law.

The Tax Court denied Harborside’s deductions from 2007 to 2012, citing Code Section 280E, which prevents any trade or business that “consists of trafficking in controlled substances from deducting any business expenses.” Harborside has appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit.

The Harborside case is not the first time that an entity specializing in the processing, sale or distribution of cannabis has challenged the constitutionality of Code Section 280E, but it is very likely the largest and the most closely watched case. And if the Ninth Circuit agrees with the appellant, it will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court.

2019 Harborside Inc. Receives Final Ruling by US Tax Court on 280E

OAKLAND, CA and TORONTO, Oct. 21, 2019 /PRNewswire/ – Harborside Inc. (“Harborside” or the “Company”) (CSE: HBOR), today announced that the U.S. Tax Court has issued a final decision under Tax Court Rule 155 on the income tax deficiency for Patients Mutual Assistance Collective Corporation (“PMACC”), the Company’s 100% owned subsidiary and owner of the iconic Harborside Oakland cannabis dispensary. The U.S. Tax Court has ruled that PMACC owes an aggregate tax deficiency of approximately $11.0 million for the fiscal years 2007 through 2012. This amount is consistent with the Company’s one-time provision for its estimated tax obligation for PMACC expensed in its financial results for the three-month period ended June 30, 2019. All dollar amounts in this press release are expressed in U.S. dollars.

“The Tax Court’s final computation of our tax obligation in PMACC’s long-standing 280E case is a good outcome for Harborside shareholders. By challenging the IRS’s overly aggressive interpretation of the tax law as it applies to cannabis businesses operating legally under State law, we have succeeded in reducing Harborside’s liability from the $36 million originally sought by the IRS to approximately $11 million – a $25 million reduction. The reduction includes $6 million in penalties that the court previously ruled we did not need to pay because of the unclear state of the law, and because Harborside acted in good faith,” said Harborside CEO Andrew Berman. “This ruling is also an important one for the cannabis industry in that, through this litigation, the court recognized there are legitimate deductions that legal cannabis companies can take in cost of goods sold. Harborside still intends to appeal the Tax Court’s ruling with regard to aspects of the decision as it pertains to the calculation of cost of goods sold, and has already retained appellate tax counsel.”

Steve DeAngelo, Harborside’s co-founder and Chairman Emeritus, also commented, “Harborside’s policy towards the federal government has always been to exhaust all reasonable available legal options to pursue justice. That policy has been validated by the Tax Court’s downward adjustment of PMACC’s liability. This outcome has strengthened our already strong resolve to continue pursuing justice by appealing the decision, with the goal of modifying or reducing 280E liability for Harborside, and in the future, eliminating it for every other state legal cannabis business in the United States. The issues at stake are of importance to the entire cannabis industry.”

The Company has 90 days within which to file an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Harborside Inc. Announces Filing Appeal in Tax Case

The Tax Court decision was issued on Nov. 29, 2018. The ruling became final on Oct. 11, 2019, when liability of US$11,013,237 was formally entered by the Tax Court. Harborside is properly filing its appeal within 90 days from that date. 

What impact does this have on the cannabis industry and states attempting to regulate marijuana?

Most cannabis business owners would like to be considered legitimate by paying federal and state taxes. But the current tax scenario has some convinced to ignore 280E on their tax filings, or don’t pay taxes at all. These businesses would rather gamble on the IRS overlooking their filing than see their revenues evaporate due to 280E.

Treasury Inspector General Recommends More Tax Audits for Cannabis

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) issued a report on March 30, 2020 which made recommendations to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding tax compliance and the cannabis industry.

The purpose of the report was to “evaluate the IRS’s examination and education approach to certain cash-based industries with an emphasis on legal marijuana operations,” as stated by the TIGTA.

https://www.treasury.gov/tigta/auditreports/2020reports/202030017fr.pdf

KOMORN LAW can help you with these types of issues – Call Our Office to Find Out More Information 248-357-2550

Recent Posts

Making Low Level Misdemeanors – Civil Infractions

Posted: June 8, 2020

 Driving a snowmobile without a registration and other low-level misdemeanors would become civil infractions under a “decriminalization” package the House Judiciary Committee started work on this week. Failing to put plates on a vehicle when buying a new car, driving farm equipment on the road without proper registration, and failing to show a safety certificate […]

Cannabis and Taxes – The challenges of non-deductible expenses

Posted: June 6, 2020

What is Section 280 E? Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code forbids businesses from deducting otherwise ordinary business expenses from gross income associated with the “trafficking” of Schedule I or II substances, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act. Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code forbids businesses from deducting otherwise ordinary business expenses from gross income […]

91 More Drug Cases Tied to Ex-Texas Cop to Be Dismissed

Posted: May 26, 2020

Prosecutors announced they expect to dismiss possibly 91 more drug convictions tied to an indicted ex-Houston Texas police officer. A look back at botched Harding Street raid… The Harris County DA’s Office had announced in February it would dismiss 73 cases connected to the former officer, Gerald Goines, whose cases are being reviewed following a […]

Charges brought on two technicians who allegedly faked tests on breathalyzer machines.

Posted: May 22, 2020

The Michigan AG filed charges against two technicians contracted to service all the DataMaster DMT breath alcohol testing instruments for the Lower Peninsula One device is at the Beverly Hills Police Department in Oakland County, the other at the Alpena County Sheriff’s Office. Michigan State Police’s Breath Alcohol Program says it found problems when conducting a routine review of records […]

Initial Study Says Cannabis Might Help Prevent COVID-19 Infections

Posted: May 17, 2020

Initial Study Says Cannabis Might Help Prevent COVID-19 Infections and Marijuana could regulate the main gateway COVID-19 enters host cells in patients, new research concludes. New research into preventive measures and possible treatment for the coronavirus could be cannabis. At first public health officials warned that inhalation of burning marijuana could lead to more vulnerability to contracting the […]

Scientists launch clinical trials to see if cannabis can be effective against the coronavirus

Posted: May 14, 2020

Israel Researchers Believe CBD Could Play Role In COVID-19 Treatment. This product, which is expected to be administrated by inhalation, will be tested against a variety of lung infections. Israeli scientists have launched clinical trials into whether cannabis can play an effective role in stopping or slowing the coronavirus.  Israeli scientists will study cannabidiol (CBD) […]

Could Zoom jury trials become the norm during the coronavirus pandemic?

Posted: May 11, 2020

In April, a Florida court held a bench trial over Zoom to decide a child abduction case under the Hague Convention. Later that month, the same state held a major virtual trial on the voting rights of convicted felons, with the public listening in by phone. As criminal courts grapple with the COVID-19 pandemic, some […]

Timeline in Macomb County Prosecutor Eric Smith Corruption Case

Posted: May 11, 2020

Eric J. Smith (Michigan politician) – Wikipedia  Eric Smith is the an American attorney and the former Prosecuting Attorney of Macomb County, Michigan. He resigned in 2020 after his arrest of embezzlement and corruption charges. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_J._Smith_(Michigan_politician) MACOMB DAILY NEWS – 2018 Source Macomb Daily News     County treasurer wants state review of prosecutor‘s ‘off book’ bank accounts […]

Lighthouse LIVE

Posted: May 7, 2020

Join us for Lighthouse LIVE Fundraiser Saturday, May 9th2:00 p.m. – 2:00 a.m. LIVE on Facebook and YouTube. LIVE Since the COVID-19 crisis began, Lighthouse has been working to keep up with the growing need in our community. We have increased our capacity for emergency shelter by more than 100% and moved to a safe […]

THE EMERGENCY POWERS OF GOVERNOR Act 302 of 1945

Posted: May 4, 2020

State of Emergency or Disaster Declaration…Pursuant to Michigan Emergency Management Act, the Governor may declare a “state of emergency” or “state of disaster” and activate applicable relief forces if an emergency or disaster or imminent threat thereof exists. MICHIGAN – EMERGENCY POWERS OF GOVERNOR (EXCERPT)Act 302 of 1945 Proclamation of state of emergency; promulgation of orders, rules, and regulations; seizure of […]

---

Tags

2020 autism BMMR cannabis CBD corona virus corruption. prosecutors covid-19 DEA detroit dispensary DUI expungement forfeiture ginnifer hency hemp komorn komornlaw lara LARA ALERTS LARA Bulletin LARA FAQ Law law enforcement abuse laws legal Legalization marijuana medical Medical Marijuana Michigan MMFLA MMMA MMMA Regulations MRA news police politics Recreational Cannabis Remote science shattuck supreme court Traffic Stop Vote

The post Cannabis and Taxes – The challenges of non-deductible expenses appeared first on Komorn Law.

View the full article