Jump to content

Acquitted On All Charges: Eric Salerno Emerges From Years-Long Marijuana Case


Recommended Posts

"This a reminder that Activism works, court support works, and the law works for legal MMJ patients!


(SACRAMENTO, CA) - "Acquitted on all charges" - Friday was a joyous day in Yuba County for Eric Salerno and his family and supporters.

For the third consecutive year, he has been battling a determined yet poorly aimed set of prosecutors in Yuba County who were intent on using taxpayer based resources to prosecute this medical marijuana patient without reasonable evidence.

Eric and his wife Desiree have been through the mill and back over this one, but today they are smiling and justice is, at least in this case, still alive in the state of California.

Salerno said, "Today I was found not guilty by a unanimous jury decision to acquit!! I'm now free of the charges brought by the Yuba County District Attorney's Office. This a reminder that Activism works,court support works, and the law works for legal MMJ patients!!"

I asked Eric how it feels to wake up and not face potentially serious charges, he said he felt, " ...relief, vindication, all those things, I feel like its been a long time coming, its like you're screaming let me out let me out I feel really happy"



Group of supporters at a court appearance several months ago


After experiencing years of uncertainty, the Salerno family finally has an opportunity to think about a future without fear of being convicted of serious crimes. I asked Eric to explain the impact the case has had on his family.

"It has taken a lot out of us, I had to take money I planned to use to put my children through college with and - over 30k in legal fees," Eric said.

Before reaching a conclusion, four different lawyers were involved in the case. Eric explains that he first hired a lawyer, "who wrote a really nice letter asking the DA to recognize Prop 215 and the law as it is written and asking if we could have open dialog to have this case dismissed and have a resolution that both parties could live with. The DA responded by saying, 'We will look at the charges and make the appropriate decision.'"

At first, Salerno faced three felonies; transportation, Possession for Sale, and Attempted Sale. "I was looking at seven years total and there would have been an added enhancement for testifying on my own - they consider it perjury if a person testifies on their own behalf and are convicted," he added.

Salerno says a second person in the case, Andre Devezin, was the qualified patient he was meeting with when everything came down, "He agreed to become a member of the collective, and initially was not charged. In the middle of the court case he was charged as a co-defendant and was offered a plea deal, by twisting his arm the DA was able to secure a witness against me. In return for his testimony, he was given a lesser charge, he ultimately pled out and was convicted of a Misdemeanor, Possession of more than an ounce of marijuana and fined," Salerno said.

"The district attorney, John Nash, said outside the courtroom during preliminary hearing, he, "... did not want to prosecute you Mr. Salerno, but that the head DA, Patrick McGrath, insisted that we continue with the case."

Salerno said, "He came outside the courtroom to me very candidly and said, 'hey if it was up to me I would dismiss the charges against Mr. Salerno but my prosecutor insists that I convict this guy.'"

Salerno says the judge, William Dawson, remarked in an off the bench comment, "Mr. Salerno, you're a communist and your whole collective model reminds me of something from communist Russia."

Salerno says he asked him, "Are you addressing me?" At that point the judge walked back into his chambers for a brief recess and upon return to the courtroom, Judge Dawson denied Salerno's medical marijuana defense in spite of his having a valid medical recommendation and the co-defendant having a valid recommendation and there being evidence of collective membership.

All logical systems designed to prevent this type of court and prosecutorial abuse failed in this case, as evidenced by Mr. Salerno's victory. I asked him what message he believes people should take away from it, "My whole message would honestly be that when people tell you to lay down and give up, when the lawyers tell you to lay down and give up, that is the signal that you have to stand up and fight and never lay down and always push for your freedom, always push back for your freedom."



Supporters of Eric Salerno gathered Friday





He says that after the judge denied his MMJ defense, Allison Margolin's office filed a writ of mandamus to the 3rd Appellate court which resulted in a stay of trial and a reversal of Judge William Dawson's decision to deny Salerno's medical marijuana defense which was ultimately allowed and reinstated into the record.

Eric Salerno said, "After Dawson denied the medical marijuana (MMJ) defense, the lawyer at the time, Lance Rogers, suggested we go to trial anyway without a MMJ defense, I actually fired him in the courtroom on the spot, made a motion for a new attorney, and was asked by the judge, why the court should do that. I explained that I had hired a MMJ attorney and a MMJ expert and with a denial of my MMJ defense I was at a disadvantage to defend myself because the judge had denied my MMJ.

The motion was granted and a public defender was appointed until the writ was finalized.

"Today after jury selection I was acquitted," Salerno said Friday. "It was a long and hard battle and Michael Levinsohn used every legal tactic available with a style best referred to as legal jujitsu, taking your enemies power and using it against them. With those tactics implemented we secured a legal victory in Yuba County court against what seemed like impossible odds."




Edited by bobandtorey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully there are people like you and Mr. Salerno, that had the courage to face the unjustified charges made against you.


Not many of us would have that kind of courage.


But as more of us take a stand, even  if it is only to vote pro-cannabis when those times come, we will eventually win.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was recently thanked but excused from jury duty when they wanted me to answer the question about "do I think this guy (the defendant) was guilty just because they were standing there with charges?" and I answered "absolutely not" upon which the prosecutor thanked and excused me.  I was hoping to get on there and serve and then let them have it but they saw through my plan!  Ha Ha Ha!!  No really I just said the honest answer that came out and that prosecutor wanted me out of there!  I guess they only want jurors who think defendants are all guilty?  Oh well, we certainly need better prosecutors and judges for sure.  May we have them soon!


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...