KLAW Blog Posted July 11, 2018 Report Share Posted July 11, 2018 Can the Department clarify the intent of Rule 24(2)(c)? Rule 24(2)(c) of the Emergency Administrative Rules filed on December 4, 2017 pertains to operation at a same location commonly referred to as co-location. For background purposes, pursuant to section 205 of the MMFLA a municipality has the authority to adopt an ordinance to limit the type or number of marihuana facilities within their boundaries. For clarification purposes, the intent behind Rule 24(2)(c) is that the applicant cannot circumvent the municipal ordinance or zoning regulation, which may limit the type or number of marihuana facilities under section 205 of the act, simply by operating at a same location. Komorn Law has represented numerous clients through the legal chaos of starting up a business in the Michigan Medical Marihuana Industry. Contact Us For More Information. 800-656-3557 The post LARA-MMFLA-Can the Department clarify the intent of Rule 24(2)(c) appeared first on Komorn Law. View the full article Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.