Jump to content

Drug Recognition Evaluator Testimony Not Valid after COA Opinion


Recommended Posts

Komorn Law in conjunction with Rudoi Law and the Michigan Association of OWI Attorneys filed an amicus brief in support of the Defendant-Appellant, who was being prosecuted in the lower court for ”operating while intoxicated by marijuana.” 

With the filing of the amicus brief in this appeal, the expert testimony of a DRE – in driving while intoxicated or impaired cases – can no longer be used in court. 

In this case the prosecutor and lower court relied on the testimony of an expert DRE (drug recognition evaluator) to prosecute this case. 

Appeals Court Agreed with the Defendant

The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled on this case agreed with the defendant and the amicus filing by Komorn Law and Rudoi Law that the DRE protocol for determining a subject’s level of impairment ‘has not been validated’.

The Court Further Stated That

“There simply is no evidence in this record to support that the DRE protocol can reliably be used to detect the degree or level of intoxication caused by marijuana and determine whether that level of intoxication has made the person unable to safely drive a motor vehicle”. 

Expert DRE testimony was inadmissible under MRE 702

The court ruled that the proposed expert DRE testimony was inadmissible under MRE 702 and reversed and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with their opinion.

With the filing of the amicus brief in this appeal, the testimony of a DRE as an expert in driving while intoxicated or impaired cases can no longer be used in court. 

Komorn Law

Attorney Michael Komorn has been on the frontline of legal defense in cannabis law, DUI, OWI, criminal defense casework and continues to lead the way in discrediting invalidated investigative methods used by law enforcement in determining a defendant’s innocence or guilt for his clients. If you’re looking to hire a true fighting lawyer… you have found him. Contact Komorn Law for a free case evaluation

Read the documents here

Komorn Law Social Media

Recent Posts

Tag Cloud

2020 2021 BMMR CBD corruption. prosecutors detroit dispensary DUI forfeiture ginnifer hency hemp komornlaw lara law enforcement abuse laws legal Legalization marijuana Medical Marijuana Michigan MMFLA MMMA MMMA Regulations MRA news police politics Recreational Cannabis science shattuck

DISCLAIMER
This post may contain re-posted content, opinions, comments, ads, third party posts, outdated information, posts from disgruntled persons, posts from those with agendas and general internet BS. Therefore…Before you believe anything on the internet regarding anything – do your research on Official Government and State Sites, Call the Michigan State Police, Check the State Attorney General Website and Consult an Attorney – Use Your Brain.

The post Drug Recognition Evaluator Testimony Not Valid after COA Opinion appeared first on Komorn Law.

View the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • dwkl unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...