peanutbutter Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 Generally I disapprove of cannibalism, but for the US congress, I'll make an exception. If no person is the clear winner in November, the decision about who the next president is falls to congress. Can you imagine the resulting feeding frenzy? There might even be a few fist fights breaking out on the House floor!! Billions and billions of graft (political donations) will be spent. Vote third party .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restorium2 Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 Generally I disapprove of cannibalism, but for the US congress, I'll make an exception. If no person is the clear winner in November, the decision about who the next president is falls to congress. Can you imagine the resulting feeding frenzy? There might even be a few fist fights breaking out on the House floor!! Billions and billions of graft (political donations) will be spent. Vote third party .. It would be Romney Biden. It's already decided like that so we have order. Why does that make you want to vote third party? It still makes no sense in this election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanutbutter Posted November 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 It would be Romney Biden. It's already decided like that so we have order. Why does that make you want to vote third party? It still makes no sense in this election. haha .. you really think they could agree ahead of time? Obama says "go ahead, you be president?" right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restorium2 Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 haha .. you really think they could agree ahead of time? Obama says "go ahead, you be president?" right. Rules dude, we have rules that cover this. Basic rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenbuddha Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 Rules dude, we have rules that cover this. Basic rules. And we have MONEY that changes those basic rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restorium2 Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 And we have MONEY that changes those basic rules. Not at this point in the election. The rules are in place and will not be changed before the outcome of this election is settled. If there is no clear winner it will be Romney Biden. It's a well known fact. Just research it a little before you post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restorium2 Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 Here's a short cut to reality; http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepoliticalsystem/a/electiontie.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaveatLector Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 Restorium is right. The US Constitution contains contingency plans for pres and vice pres selection should there be an electoral college tie. Money isn't going to change the const or the selection process between now and January. Restorium could be right about a Romney/Biden selection but I don't know. The US House selects the President and they only get one vote per state. So that vote is decided in a caucas-style election in states where there is more than 1 US Congress member. So, for example, if Michigan has 15 Congress(wo)men then they all vote and whatever the outcome in that vote becomes the ultimate single vote cast for Pres. So, in that way, a Repub. controlled House could still vote a Dem pres into office. Why? Because if TX has 53 congress(wo)men and they are all Repub. they still only have one vote. If Montana has one congress(wo)man it also gets one vote. So if TX were predominantly Repub and Montana were Dem it would still only be a 1:1 vote. So, in that way, a republican controlled house could still vote in a Dem president. So what matters in the house is not the number of Repubs vs. the number of Dems but, rather, the number of repub controlled states vs. the number of dem controlled states. I don't know the current number so I cannot provide that info. The Senate selects the vice pres and each Senator gets a single vote. So that is easier to predict based on the number of senators and their political leanings. Basically one can assume that a repub controlled senate would vote for a repub candidate and a dem controlled would vote dem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenbuddha Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 Restorium is right. The US Constitution contains contingency plans for pres and vice pres selection should there be an electoral college tie. Money isn't going to change the const or the selection process between now and January. Restorium could be right about a Romney/Biden selection but I don't know. The US House selects the President and they only get one vote per state. So that vote is decided in a caucas-style election in states where there is more than 1 US Congress member. So, for example, if Michigan has 15 Congress(wo)men then they all vote and whatever the outcome in that vote becomes the ultimate single vote cast for Pres. So, in that way, a Repub. controlled House could still vote a Dem pres into office. Why? Because if TX has 53 congress(wo)men and they are all Repub. they still only have one vote. If Montana has one congress(wo)man it also gets one vote. So if TX were predominantly Repub and Montana were Dem it would still only be a 1:1 vote. So, in that way, a republican controlled house could still vote in a Dem president. So what matters in the house is not the number of Repubs vs. the number of Dems but, rather, the number of repub controlled states vs. the number of dem controlled states. I don't know the current number so I cannot provide that info. The Senate selects the vice pres and each Senator gets a single vote. So that is easier to predict based on the number of senators and their political leanings. Basically one can assume that a repub controlled senate would vote for a repub candidate and a dem controlled would vote dem. Yes, I too, still believe in fairytales. Glad to see I'm not the only one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanutbutter Posted November 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 Restorium is right. The US Constitution contains contingency plans for pres and vice pres selection should there be an electoral college tie. Money isn't going to change the const or the selection process between now and January. Restorium could be right about a Romney/Biden selection but I don't know. The US House selects the President and they only get one vote per state. So that vote is decided in a caucas-style election in states where there is more than 1 US Congress member. So, for example, if Michigan has 15 Congress(wo)men then they all vote and whatever the outcome in that vote becomes the ultimate single vote cast for Pres. So, in that way, a Repub. controlled House could still vote a Dem pres into office. Why? Because if TX has 53 congress(wo)men and they are all Repub. they still only have one vote. If Montana has one congress(wo)man it also gets one vote. So if TX were predominantly Repub and Montana were Dem it would still only be a 1:1 vote. So, in that way, a republican controlled house could still vote in a Dem president. So what matters in the house is not the number of Repubs vs. the number of Dems but, rather, the number of repub controlled states vs. the number of dem controlled states. I don't know the current number so I cannot provide that info. The Senate selects the vice pres and each Senator gets a single vote. So that is easier to predict based on the number of senators and their political leanings. Basically one can assume that a repub controlled senate would vote for a repub candidate and a dem controlled would vote dem. And I wonder how long all of that would take? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanutbutter Posted November 5, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 All of this isn't on ANY radar .. No plans have been established about how to run campaigns if the tie happens .. One requirement is that THREE persons be considered by congress. The top THREE candidates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restorium2 Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 All of this isn't on ANY radar .. No plans have been established about how to run campaigns if the tie happens .. One requirement is that THREE persons be considered by congress. The top THREE candidates. It has been mapped out for over 200 years now; http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/tocs/amendXII.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaveatLector Posted November 5, 2012 Report Share Posted November 5, 2012 All of this isn't on ANY radar .. No plans have been established about how to run campaigns if the tie happens .. One requirement is that THREE persons be considered by congress. The top THREE candidates. I don't think there is a requirement that 3 be considered. I think that is a maximum. How do you know there are no contingency plans built into campaigns if this were to happen? I'm sure there are. Unless you are privy to campaign strategy I don't think you would know what the particular candidate is prepared for. I would think that strong lobbying would take place, not unlike lobbying that already occurs ahead of voting on contentious bills. Chances of this happening are pretty slim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.