What Would You Do?

[Ms Chocolate]

ENFORCEMENT PRIOITIES

No distribution of marijuana to minors;

No revenue from the sale of marijuana is to go to criminal enterprises, gangs and cartels;

No diversion of marijuana from states where it is legal under state law in some form to other states;

No state-authorized marijuana activity from being used as a cover or pretext for the trafficking of other illegal drugs or other illegal activity;

No violence or the use of firearms in the cultivation and distribution of marijuana

No drugged driving and the exacerbation of other adverse public health consequences associated with marijuana use;

No growing of marijuana on public lands and the attendant public safety and environmental dangers posed by marijuana production on public lands;

No marijuana possession or use on federal property.

 

 

We have the list of federal no-no, so I have a question for you. If the state of Michigan allowed, let's say a 3-year trial where all marijuana use was legal, but if during those years there were noticeable breaches and substantial increase cost of enforcement, resulting in the disallowances of all and future marijuana laws; would you report those breaches?

 

 

[GrassMonkey]

Depends.

 

I suppose if the majority of the people were abusing the system then yes.

 

But more likely scenario is there's always going to be a few bad apples in the bunch, no sense in punishing the majority for what the minority do, like as with alcohol. So no I would not report it.

 

Just my 2 cents.

[greenbuddha]

'NO'...let LEO do its own job, that's what they get paid to do.

[Celliach]

I don't call the police.

 

People call them on me.

[Kingdiamond]

Not a chance .

[Kingdiamond]

I don't call the police.

 

People call them on me.

Sounds like my life.

[pergamum362]

Nope.

[ozzrokk]

Like others have said........ I am not a cop caller.......... I am a get cops called on..........

[Mickeydee]

Just say no to the Po Po!

[phaquetoo]

nope no call to cops from me, leo is not my friend!

 

peace

[Ms Chocolate]

I was discussing this memo with others. We tossed around that to save money, the feds just pushed enforcement to the states. The states will, in turn, push some of the enforcement to the cities. All this pushing will be done under the watchful eyes of the DOJ. All this talking and speculation found us wondering how would we respond if MI offered some level of short-term legalization, but the public would be charged with enforcement. Would we promote enforcement or would we let the program die? Wanting a marijuana/marihuana program of some type, we were on the fence, leaning more to one side or the other. I was just curious to see where the leaning was here. Thanks you all for your responses.