Jump to content

Lake Orion Woman's Medical Marijuana Case Returns To Court After Court Of Appeals Ruling With Video


Recommended Posts

Nearly three months to the day after a medical marijuana raid thatresulted in a conviction against a Lake Orion woman, the case was back in court Friday for an evidentiary hearing.

Agro’s conviction for delivery or manufacture of marijuana wassent back to Oakland County Circuit Judge Wendy Potts’ courtroom by the Michigan Court of Appeals. 

Prosecutors conceded that the trial court’s conclusion was valid at the time of the July 2011 conviction but is contrary to a 2012 Supreme Court ruling on the law.Agro asked for a new trial but the Court of Appeals agreed with the prosecution, which argued that a pretrial hearing should be continued.

 

http://www.theoaklandpress.com/articles/2013/08/23/news/local_news/doc5217babd33012531600811.txt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nearly three months to the day after a medical marijuana raid thatresulted in a conviction against a Lake Orion woman, the case was back in court Friday for an evidentiary hearing.

 

Agro’s conviction for delivery or manufacture of marijuana wassent back to Oakland County Circuit Judge Wendy Potts’ courtroom by the Michigan Court of Appeals. 

 

Prosecutors conceded that the trial court’s conclusion was valid at the time of the July 2011 conviction but is contrary to a 2012 Supreme Court ruling on the law.Agro asked for a new trial but the Court of Appeals agreed with the prosecution, which argued that a pretrial hearing should be continued.

 

http://www.theoaklandpress.com/articles/2013/08/23/news/local_news/doc5217babd33012531600811.txt

 

If the Supreme Court's ruling in 2012 was contrary to the trial court's conclusion in 2011, how could the trial court's conclusion have been valid in 2011?

 

Law Enforcement and the Courts are dominated by males for one reason:

 

Men are unable to ever admit that they are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Law Enforcement and the Courts are dominated by males for one reason:

 

Men are unable to ever admit that they are wrong.

 

 

 

chauncy g:  Typing based upon gender is a broad, inaccurate and unfair brush that glosses over people's individuality.   In the future would you please give us much more accurate observations... 

Edited by pic book
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Law Enforcement and the Courts are dominated by males for one reason:

 

Men are unable to ever admit that they are wrong.

 

 

 

chauncy g:  Typing based upon gender is a broad, inaccurate and unfair brush that glosses over people's individuality.   In the future would you please give us much more accurate observations... 

I can

She got screwed back then and so did a lot others for now but things our about to change if she can  get to a jury it will be over for the courts and they know it 

thats why they are fighting so hard to keep the truth from a jury 

We have not seen one case yet that a jury can here that someone has  a card 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Law Enforcement and the Courts are dominated by males for one reason:

 

Men are unable to ever admit that they are wrong.

 

 

 

chauncy g:  Typing based upon gender is a broad, inaccurate and unfair brush that glosses over people's individuality.   In the future would you please give us much more accurate observations... 

Who died and made you boss?  his statement wasnt sexist or racist, can he not give his opinion in an open forum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can

She got screwed back then and so did a lot others for now but things our about to change if she can  get to a jury it will be over for the courts and they know it 

thats why they are fighting so hard to keep the truth from a jury 

We have not seen one case yet that a jury can here that someone has  a card 

 

 

I think Bob has summed it up quite accurately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can

She got screwed back then and so did a lot others for now but things our about to change if she can  get to a jury it will be over for the courts and they know it 

thats why they are fighting so hard to keep the truth from a jury 

We have not seen one case yet that a jury can here that someone has  a card 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you would have a better chance with a jury........... With the high percentage of people that understand and are for marijuana. I would imagine that you would have a better chance of a jury not convicting you on a biased personal opinion on MJ over a judge.......

Edited by ozzrokk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed a report today the Zimmerman attorney (remember him?) is asking the State of Florida for $300,000 for legal expenses. Since the jury ruled Zimmerman was not guilty, the State must pay the defendants legal costs in Florida.

 

Would this same situation occur if the State of Michigan or a PA loses a mmj case? Does the State of Michigan pay the defendants legal fees if they lose a case after a jury trial?

Edited by outsideinthecold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...