Jump to content

Michigan Vote On Legalizing Marijuana Is Likely In 2018


bobandtorey

Recommended Posts

LANSING, Mich. (AP) – Organizers of a ballot drive to legalize the use of marijuana for recreational purposes in Michigan submitted 365,000 signatures to the state Monday, which appears to be more than enough to qualify the initiative for a statewide vote in 2018.
 
The Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol said the prohibition against recreational marijuana is “a massive failure.”
Michigan has allowed medical marijuana use for nearly a decade. If the new proposal were to make the ballot and win voter approval, it would make Michigan the ninth state to legalize the drug for recreational use.If passed, people 21 and older could possess up to 2.5 ounces (71 grams) of marijuana and grow up to 12 plants at home. A 10 percent tax on marijuana would be assessed on top of the 6 percent state sales tax.

 

Josh Hovey, a spokesman for the coalition, said fully legalizing the drug for adults would generate hundreds of millions in new tax revenue. He estimated that 20,000 people in the state are arrested annually for marijuana possession and cultivation.

“Oftentimes it’s just adults using a plant that is less harmful than alcohol or tobacco,” he said at a news conference a couple of blocks from the state Bureau of Elections. “It’s breaking up families. It’s destroying communities. … We can impose some regulations, create a new industry in the state. You’re going to see not only the tax benefits of that, but jobs, less crime and letting law enforcement go after things that are more important.”

State officials will take about two months to review the voter signatures. If they determine that about 252,000 are valid, the bill would go to the Republican-controlled Legislature. Lawmakers would have 40 days to adopt the measure or it would be placed on the November 2018 statewide ballot. Legislators could propose an alternative marijuana bill to put before voters alongside the initiative.

Organizers do not expect the Legislature to consider their proposal.

“Based on my experience working in that Legislature, I don’t think we would have a majority of votes for a sensible legalization bill,” said former Democratic state Rep. Jeff Irwin, of Ann Arbor, the coalition’s political director.

Organizers want to raise $8 million, overall. They have spent nearly all of the $600,000 collected as of Oct. 20, including for paid signature collectors. The committee had received nearly $700,000 more of in-kind help, including for petition gathering, from groups such as the Marijuana Policy Project, a Washington, D.C.-based organization that was the driving force behind successful legalization ballot initiatives in other states.

Irwin said he expects opioid makers to heavily fund opposition to the measure because they have done so in other states with marijuana ballot drives.

An opposition group, Keep Pot Out of Neighborhoods and Schools, said Monday that the proposal is “ill-advised” and “not in the public interest.”

Spokesman Chris De Witt pointed to how the state is on the verge of starting a licensing system for medical marijuana businesses next month.

The initiative, he said, “will be creating a system that allows for mass quantities of unregulated, untested and untaxed marijuana to be grown by anybody anywhere — creating a true black market for illegal drugs.”

As of Oct. 20, the opposition committee had raised $5,000 from a single source, the Michigan Responsibility Council — a marijuana industry trade group.

According to national polls, a solid majority of Americans support legalization. Gallup’s latest survey gauged support at 64 percent, up from 12 percent from when the question was first posed in 1969.

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2017/11/22/michigan-vote-on-legalizing-marijuana-is-likely-in-2018/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I reading this wrong, based on section 3.c of the initiative, the concentration level is limited to 0.3%:

Sec. 3. As used in this act:

(a) "Cultivate" means to propagate, breed, grow, harvest, dry, cure, or separate parts of the marihuana plant by manual or mechanical means.

(b) "Department" means the department of licensing and regulatory affairs.

(c) "Industrial hemp" means a plant of the genus cannabis and any part of that plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration that does not exceed 0.3% on a dry-weight basis, or per volume or weight of marihuana-infused product, or the combined percent of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid in any part of the plant of the genus cannabis regardless of moisture content.

Isn't this level lower than any strain that's out there?  Or am I just misunderstanding the intent of the language.  As I see it, based on the proposed language, any product higher than 0.3% would be illegal.

I certainly hope I'm misinterpreting the language, if not, someone needs to change the initiative before its too late.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

crmla / milegalize language legalizes cannabis sativa and creates 2 categories of rules based on thc content. industrial hemp and marihuana

Sec. 2. The purpose of this act is to make marihuana legal under state and local law for adults 21 years of age or older, to make industrial hemp legal under state and local law,

 


(e) “Marihuana” means all parts of the plant of the genus cannabis, growing or not;

(c) “Industrial hemp” means a plant of the genus cannabis and any part of that plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration that does not exceed 0.3% on a dry-weight basis, or per volume or weight of marihuana-infused product, or the combined percent of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid in any part of the plant of the genus cannabis regardless of moisture content.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, outsideinxpert said:

Am I reading this wrong, based on section 3.c of the initiative, the concentration level is limited to 0.3%:

Sec. 3. As used in this act:

(a) "Cultivate" means to propagate, breed, grow, harvest, dry, cure, or separate parts of the marihuana plant by manual or mechanical means.

(b) "Department" means the department of licensing and regulatory affairs.

(c) "Industrial hemp" means a plant of the genus cannabis and any part of that plant, whether growing or not, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration that does not exceed 0.3% on a dry-weight basis, or per volume or weight of marihuana-infused product, or the combined percent of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and tetrahydrocannabinolic acid in any part of the plant of the genus cannabis regardless of moisture content.

Isn't this level lower than any strain that's out there?  Or am I just misunderstanding the intent of the language.  As I see it, based on the proposed language, any product higher than 0.3% would be illegal.

I certainly hope I'm misinterpreting the language, if not, someone needs to change the initiative before its too late.

 

What it means is that if you have marijuana that's over .3% THC then it isn't considered 'hemp' and counts towards your legal limit;

If passed, people 21 and older could possess up to 2.5 ounces (71 grams) of marijuana and grow up to 12 plants at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sec. 5. 1.

.......
(b) within the person’s residence, possessing, storing, and processing not more than 10 ounces of marihuana and any marihuana produced by
marihuana plants cultivated on the premises and cultivating not more than 12 marihuana plants for personal use, provided that no more than 12
marihuana plants are possessed, cultivated, or processed on the premises at once;

and

Sec. 4. 1. This act does not authorize:
.......
(i) Possessing more than 2.5 ounces of marihuana within a person’s place of residence unless the excess marihuana is stored in a container or area equipped with locks or other functioning security devices that restrict access to the contents of the container or area.

 

 

I am not a lawyer.

The way I understand it is:

2.5oz in public

10oz accumulative, in a private residence, of "marihuana" that was not produced by your 12 plants. 

Unlimited weight, in a private residence, of "marihuana" that was produced by your 12 plants.

Any amount over 2.5oz must be locked up or secured in a way that restricts access by others.

*These limits are only applicable to people growing, possessing, and processing 12 plants at one time. Would be nice if it also applied to Caregivers who are allowed more then 12 plants. However it does not seem as though this is the case.

Again, not a lawyer, this is what I understand from reading the initiative language.

 

PDF of Initiative Language attached.

 

Initiative_Language.pdf

Edited by Easy E
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...