Jump to content

Finally Found Free Marijuana !


trichcycler

Recommended Posts

 

Free Marijuana For Low-Income Residents Under New Berkeley Law

 

 

 

The Huffington Post |

 

 

A California city is offering a unique benefit for low-income residents: free marijuana.

 

Starting next summer, Berkeley residents who earn less than $32,000 per year (or $46,000 per family) and have a prescription for medical marijuana will be able to get it for free from one of the dispensaries operating within the city.

 

Under a law passed unanimously by the city council, dispensaries must set aside 2 percent of their pot for distribution to the poor.

 

Not everyone is on board with the plan.

 

“It’s ludicrous, over-the-top madness,” Bishop Ron Allen, head of the International Faith Based Coalition, told Fox News. “Why would Berkeley City Council want to keep their poverty-stricken under-served high, in poverty and lethargic?”

 

But supporters say that marijuana is recognized as a legal medicine in the state of California (although not federally). And as medicine, people who need it shouldn't be kept away from it due to lack of funds.

 

“Basically, the city council wants to make sure that low-income, homeless, indigent folks have access to their medical marijuana, their medicine,” Berkeley City Councilmember Darryl Moore told CBS San Francisco.

 

“There are some truly compassionate cases that need to have medical marijuana,” Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates told The New York Times. “But it’s expensive. You hear stories about people dying from cancer who don’t have the money.”

 

Despite the controversy, many dispensaries say this won't change much since they already set aside a certain amount of weed for compassionate (a.k.a. free) distribution.

 

“We do this on our own, so we certainly welcome the city mandating that all dispensaries create these sorts of programs,” Sean Luse, chief operating officer of Berkeley Patients Group dispensary, told Berkeleyside over the summer.

 

However, Luse added that he thinks 1 percent, rather than 2 percent, would be a more appropriate target.

 

“I do think there could be problems if we’re oversupplying demand and giving away more cannabis than is legitimately needed,” Luse said. “We’ll see how this plays out.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem giving free meds to people in need but mandating it is another thing entirely.  If they did that then I wouldn't give any away as the gov't sets the donation.  I'd be more apt to give if I am not mandated.

  Maybe the others that wouldn't give would even it out.

  Then there are those that would sell their meds.  Think of the opiate problem out there.  Me giving to people I know are in need is a better checks and balances.  Cause if I found out they'd get cut off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem giving free meds to people in need but mandating it is another thing entirely. If they did that then I wouldn't give any away as the gov't sets the donation. I'd be more apt to give if I am not mandated.

Maybe the others that wouldn't give would even it out.

Then there are those that would sell their meds. Think of the opiate problem out there. Me giving to people I know are in need is a better checks and balances. Cause if I found out they'd get cut off.

I don't think they will be selling it, they will be given a gram if they can prove that they can't afford it. Edited by grateful411
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...